Re: icefox tests issues

Thanks. I'll try.

Raul Fernandes
[email protected]

Em Segunda 25 Outubro 2004 09:02, Lubos Lunak escreveu:
> On Friday 22 of October 2004 04:00, Raul Fernandes wrote:
> > >That's slightly more than 20% time saved in the best case, and it is for
> > > code only executing empty loops. Adding some useful code into the body
> > > loops would reduce the improvement, and KDE applications also don't
> > > spend all the time just iterating over lists. In reality the gain could
> > > possibly be even negligibly small.
> > >That said, I don't see any good reason against, so if you're willing to
> > > do this tedious work and do the changes in KDE, why not?
> >
> > In a directory with >2000 files to interate over, adding a UDSEntry for
> > every file to interate over, we could have a small improvement, maybe not
> > so negligibly small. Improving all loops like this, we can get a speedup.
> >
> > >That should be sufficient. You could also probably get a CVS account to
> > > do your changes yourself if you're willing to work more on this.
> >
> > Well, I took this as a Junior Job, really. This type of "bugfix" makes a
> > newbie (like me) be more familiar with the code to make more deeper
> > changes in the future. How can I get a CVS account and start the work??
> > Or only send patches here??
>
> 
> http://developer.kde.org/documentation/tutorials/howto/developer-howto.html
>#cvsaccount http://kde.org/jobs/
>
>  In case you don't qualify yet, just send the patches here.