Re: Cleaning up after objects...

--- Thomas Fjellstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm slightly confused as how I should do cleanup.. Is there a
> "DELETE" 
> equivelent to the NEW method?

No, not a real eequivalent. We seem to have overlooked it...

> Basically what I want is to have a "message" sent through a socket on
> destroy. 
> Using the destroyed signal seems risky as I need some info in the
> object to 
> make the connection and send the message, and it spicifically says
> the 
> object's vtable will be "degenerated" at that point and to not call
> any 
> methods on it.

Which info? If you need to call a C++ method on that object, that's
right. However, if you store the data you need in the Perl object,
it'll still be OK from the deleted() handler, or from an ON_DESTROY
method, depending on the way your program works.

I should've added an ON_DELETE function. It's not that hard to add to
QtSmokeBinding::deleted()

Ashley Winters


		
Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/