Re: kmail serious problems
Laurent Montel <[email protected]> Mon, 06 Feb 2023 11:47:27 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le lundi 6 février 2023, 11:07:18 CET Kevin Ottens a écrit : > Hello, > > On Monday, 6 February 2023 09:35:52 CET Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > On Montag, 6. Februar 2023 08:49:41 CET Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > On Sunday, 5 February 2023 23:42:21 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > I'm telling all this because it looks like something is *really* rotten > > > somewhere in our POP3/Maildir story. Asking people to just switch to > > > IMAP > > > is unrealistic though, there are valid uses for POP3. > > > > The other side of the coin is that expecting developers (which > > developers?) > > who are using IMAP exclusively to put an extra amount of their unpaid > > spare > > time into keeping POP3 support in good condition is also unrealistic. > > Sorry if I made it sound different earlier. But I totally agree with that of > course. > > > I think the POP3 support never really recovered from the switch to Akonadi > > as backend and that's because all involved developers have used IMAP > > almost > > exclusively since ages. > > I wonder if I should force myself to go back to POP3 then... not that I > really want to since I just appreciate the services of IMAP... > > > Additionally, to this KMail has effectively 0 developers and 1/10 > > maintainers. Laurent is doing an inhuman job but he > > maintains large parts of PIM and, currently, does KF6 porting in > > uncountable other KDE projects. > > > > If you want to stay with KMail, then I recommend that you set up a local > > dovecot to bridge POP3 to IMAP. I have done this for a couple of > > unimportant POP3 accounts many years ago and it's been working flawlessly > > for years now. > > The thing is that we're not doing a very good job at communicating this to > the outside then. If POP3 is really that broken and it's known, maybe > support should be removed? Or at least prevent users to create new POP3 > setups? > > Otherwise people think it's supposed to work and then think KMail is low > quality, which I think is very far from the truth. > > Regards. > > PS: That being all said, my spouse is using KMail POP3 support happily. Less > volume of mail and many less filters of course. I confess I wish she had > troubles with it sometimes... then I'd have something manageable to try to > debug. But luckily for a pacified home it just works. Just for info, I use POP3 (20 years) for my private email/kde email (so a lot of emails). I have more than 50 filters, and all works fine. Long time ago I wanted to start to improve pop3, but my perso time is limited when we remove all works on ruqola/pim*/kf6 porting :) Perhaps after switching to kf6 I will have more time for it. Regards. -- Laurent Montel | [email protected] | KDE/Qt Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel: France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.fr KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts