Re: Should we remove poursuivant from #kontact
Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> Fri, 07 Apr 2023 22:23:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4795551.GXAFRqVoOG@daneel> |
On Freitag, 7. April 2023 21:45:04 CEST Carl Schwan wrote: > I wonder if we should remove poursuivant from the #kontact irc/matrix > channel. It generates a lot of noise and has generally been removed from > several kde channels in recent years. It depends a bit on the raison d'être of this channel. With the constant flood of pursuivant messages the channel is pretty much useless for any normal conversation. The occasional user question is quickly drowned and most likely missed by most. So, if the channel's purpose isn't the KDE PIM commit stream then removing the commit stream is probably the right decision. An alternative would be to filter out GIT_SILENT commits, but it seems Laurent stopped using this keyword even for "Remove unused includes" commits. I kind of like the commit posts for itinerary, but maybe I should simply follow Volker on invent. :-) Regards, Ingo
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQTbjgIOMowwlCBgvyGxb1mVFkdKugUCZDB7swAKCRCxb1mVFkdK ur/JAQDL6KJcEdccbvTbRM7b1sLeFlBkAy5BXhlY5WEC5TzQbQEA371dRJhv7C1F 7zSMfWKT94yi2bjtI1qpP9GF2EPW/QY= =zxXQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----