Re: September/October KDE PIM summary blog post
Carl Schwan <[email protected]> Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:10:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.pim |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5017910.LvFx2qVVIh@fedora> |
--nextPart2757670.ElGaqSPkdT Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1" From: Carl Schwan <[email protected]> To: KDE PIM <[email protected]> Cc: Claudio Cambra <[email protected]> Subject: Re: September/October KDE PIM summary blog post Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:10:55 +0100 Message-ID: <5017910.LvFx2qVVIh@fedora> In-Reply-To: <10550702.nUPlyArG6x@vkpc5> References: <10550702.nUPlyArG6x@vkpc5> MIME-Version: 1.0 On Friday, October 25, 2024 4:19:08=E2=80=AFPM Central European Standard Ti= me Volker=20 Krause wrote: > Hello everyone, >=20 > it's time for the bi-monthly blog post again :) >=20 > If you have contributed in the past two months a summary of your most > noteworthy changes would be helpful, bonus points for corresponding > screenshots or links to already existing blog posts. If you noticed > something noteworthy during the past two months, feel free to add that as > well of course! >=20 > To help refresh your memories and to make sure we aren't missing anything > important, there's two files attached here, an auto-generated detailed > changelog (this tends to be 30-50% of the commits, using David F's change= log > scripts for KF releases), and basic commit stats for the PIM repositories. >=20 > K=C3=A9vin had signed up to manage this iteration: > https://invent.kde.org/pim/pim-technical-roadmap/-/issues/69. ## Merkuro Claudio has been busy fixing regressions and improving the stability of=20 Merkuro. Notably, maps are now displayed again (if the event contains=20 coordinates), the collection combobox in the editors are now initialized wi= th=20 a valid collection, filtering by name or tag works again, ... > However, with the rise of the "This Week in KDE Apps" (TWIKA) blog series > since Akademy, there is now some amount of overlap. TWIKA has the higher > production value usually, the much higher frequency and presumably higher > reach, so one option could be to fold the PIM series into that and not > having a dedicated series anymore at all. If we want to do that we can > decide to do this now or with one of the future iterations, but I'd sugge= st > we do a final post pointing to TWIKA as the continuation in that case. >=20 > Personally I'd be in favor of doing that (but I'm biased as that would mo= ve > work off my plate), it does require a bit more discipline from all of us > though to basically immediately add noteworthy features to the next TWIKA > MR. >=20 > What do you think? Yes, for Twika I collect the list of changes from the list of merge request= s=20 closed in the last 7 days. So if you want your changes to be mentioned, mak= e=20 sure to either create a merge request with your changes or suggest your=20 changes to the merge request for the blog post. https://invent.kde.org/websites/blogs-kde-org/-/merge_requests/53/ diffs#983daff0bd6fe590c24877c0b6eb4f09a84312eb_0_28 I can't realistically look at the git history of every repos to see if ther= e=20 is anything worth mentioning myself. Cheers, Carl >=20 > Regards, > Volker --nextPart2757670.ElGaqSPkdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEOf+pPK6cavwhKtACAjJUSCBORSoFAmcfxZ8ACgkQAjJUSCBO RSpGvgf/fSe2q7XvVVch2J7BynlxAsLlVU/QKFz3l28WpuWerctcE71ooLdtcD6F MEfwfGeyxs6A0BboDFalsd1n/iZteFU4c4Hms2Qo1X0CjzA5tZv82folxZ5CZZ1C mfsua7vgAjfnlDblezUDnpVQU13tqmrIbMZaoEb69Po4cZIRr03Nsg/tl8dxxBw8 FQN1JsFbYP352UlXzj9fGWBWQf5U2Q++MXbeE88Y6j9eN4CSvKTZ3+OKvVqNNdZT f0fg97cmpiLDQbNJfJ4j4eVmtv3400gYmc6VgUSukxAmsi3FKLdcx04rF3Dg0Zb1 MRycURXT8KAJmvZstGtAD5omke2W2Q== =yF83 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2757670.ElGaqSPkdT--