Re: Goodbye
Emmett Culley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.quanta.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/31/2009 10:07 AM, Cliff Nieuwenhuis wrote: > Replying to message from Mark Ziegler<[email protected]>: > >> after many years of using Quanta I say good bye to Quanta and KDE. > > I'm in the same position. I loved KDE3 and used it for real work. > KDE4 broke everything I used regularly -- Quanta on the top of the > list. I'm very upset by that; more upset than I thought I'd ever get > about a desktop. > > I've found Xfce4 (Zenwalk) works for me as a replacement for KDE, but I > can't get Quanta / Kwebdev to work. I'm not going to try anymore. If > Quanta is tied so tight with KDE4 then I'll find something else, but so > far nothing matches Quanta. > > I'm a web developer, not a programmer, so I don't understand why a > version of Quanta can't be built for Xfce, but I can't do it and I > can't help, so all I can do is hope and wait. > I really don't get the problem here. Unless I am missing something. I've installed Fedora 9, 10 and 11 numerous times on many different machines (mostly x84_64). Fedora 9 was sort of a mess for the first couple of months, until KDE 4 stabilized around 4.1. However, in ALL cases Quanta has been, and still is, working as great as it has for years. I couldn't work without it. That and Eclipse. All it required me to do was select the kdewebdev package when installing. All of the required KDE 3 libs and any other dependencies were installed automatically, every time. I happen to love KDE 4 (especially since 4.3 delivered) and I cannot get what could be missing that would make it unusable. And it just keeps getting better. I am looking forward to trying a new Quanta that will take full advantage to KDE 4, but in the mean time it is serving us very well. Regards, Emmett