Re: Goodbye
David Brooke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.quanta.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 01 November 2009 01:14:57 Emmett Culley wrote: > I really don't get the problem here. Unless I am missing something. I've > installed Fedora 9, 10 and 11 numerous times on many different machines > (mostly x84_64). Fedora 9 was sort of a mess for the first couple of > months, until KDE 4 stabilized around 4.1. > > However, in ALL cases Quanta has been, and still is, working as great as it > has for years. I couldn't work without it. That and Eclipse. All it > required me to do was select the kdewebdev package when installing. All of > the required KDE 3 libs and any other dependencies were installed > automatically, every time. > > I happen to love KDE 4 (especially since 4.3 delivered) and I cannot get > what could be missing that would make it unusable. And it just keeps > getting better. > > I am looking forward to trying a new Quanta that will take full advantage > to KDE 4, but in the mean time it is serving us very well. > > Regards, > Emmett I have got Quanta working on top of KDE4 under slackware and can't see anything missing. Just install kdewebdev and the legacy libraries, I can't remember precisely how many bits you need but its not many - there are bound to be details on the web at www.linuxquestions.org in the slackware list. Dave _______________________________________________ Quanta mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta