Re: Congrats Milian
Billie Erin Walsh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.quanta.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/03/2010 01:01 PM, John Culleton wrote: > On Saturday 01 May 2010 23:32:22 [email protected] wrote: > >> I have a request for the new developer. I used to use Quanta when I >> was using KDE 3.5.X. At some point in one of the upgrades on my distro >> it became unstable. I switched over to using Kate. Kate used to have >> really good tools for HTML. After moving to KDE 4.X.X Kate lost the >> HTML tools and Quanta has been absent. >> >> I have been using Vim now and it has really strong customization for >> anything. I have Vim setup with a lot of HTML tools it is much better >> and faster then Quanta ever was when I used to use it. Not knocking >> Quanta. It was good and I used it for 6 years. >> >> Please work toward letting Quanta behave like Vim AND Emacs. Don't >> want to start a flame war. Or at least have heavy customization >> available. >> >> If Quanta will actually come back and have heavy customization I will >> probably come back to it. If not, Vim works really well. >> > My requirement is much simpler. Give me a Quanta that will work with QT4 > and KDE4 that has the same feature set and reliablity of what I had under > the last functional KDE 3.5 version of Quanta. > > The perfect can be the enemy of the good. > Plus ONE. If it could just work as well as it did in 3.5 I will be one happy camper. Some days I spend 8 to 10 hours a day between Gimp and Quanta. Even as crippled as it is it's still the best available. -- Some people are like Slinky's. Not good for much but fun to watch when you push them down the stairs. Sent with Thunderbird on my Kubuntu Linux Desktop