Re: Congrats Milian

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Billie Erin Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/03/2010 01:01 PM, John Culleton wrote:
>> On Saturday 01 May 2010 23:32:22 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> I have a request for the new developer. I used to use Quanta when I
>>> was using KDE 3.5.X. At some point in one of the upgrades on my distro
>>> it became unstable. I switched over to using Kate. Kate used to have
>>> really good tools for HTML. After moving to KDE 4.X.X Kate lost the
>>> HTML tools and Quanta has been absent.
>>>
>>> I have been using Vim now and it has really strong customization for
>>> anything. I have Vim setup with a lot of HTML tools it is much better
>>> and faster then Quanta ever was when I used to use it. Not knocking
>>> Quanta. It was good and I used it for 6 years.
>>>
>>> Please work toward letting Quanta behave like Vim AND Emacs. Don't
>>> want to start a flame war. Or at least have heavy customization
>>> available.
>>>
>>> If Quanta will actually come back and have heavy customization I will
>>> probably come back to it. If not, Vim works really well.
>>>
>> My requirement is much simpler. Give me a Quanta that will work with QT4
>> and KDE4 that has the same feature set and reliablity of what I had under
>> the last functional KDE 3.5 version of Quanta.
>>
>> The perfect can be the enemy of the good.
>>
>
> Plus ONE.
>
> If it could just work as well as it did in 3.5 I will be one happy
> camper. Some days I spend 8 to 10 hours a day between Gimp and Quanta.
> Even as crippled as it is it's still the best available.

What version of KDE4 did Quanta become available? I haven't seen any
trace of it and I am on 4.3.5 getting ready to upgrade the system and
will be on 4.4.2

-- 
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong
enough to take everything you have.
-Thomas Jefferson