Re: Congrats Milian
David Brooke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.quanta.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 02 May 2010 04:32:22 [email protected] wrote: > I have a request for the new developer. I used to use Quanta when I > was using KDE 3.5.X. At some point in one of the upgrades on my distro > it became unstable. I switched over to using Kate. Kate used to have > really good tools for HTML. After moving to KDE 4.X.X Kate lost the > HTML tools and Quanta has been absent. > > I have been using Vim now and it has really strong customization for > anything. I have Vim setup with a lot of HTML tools it is much better > and faster then Quanta ever was when I used to use it. Not knocking > Quanta. It was good and I used it for 6 years. > > Please work toward letting Quanta behave like Vim AND Emacs. Don't > want to start a flame war. Or at least have heavy customization > available. > > If Quanta will actually come back and have heavy customization I will > probably come back to it. If not, Vim works really well. > I'm happily using Quanta as a KDE3 legacy program under KDE4 on Slackware and all I want is a Quanta that works under KDE4 directly. My understanding is that Quanta and Kdevelop both use or used the Kate editor. If I'm right and there is a Vim or Emacs mode for Kate then people can use that but if not then please don't change the editor - leave that to the editor developers. I could use Kate for all my html editing but I'm lazy and want the code completion plus project awareness that quanta has under kde3. -- David Brooke