Re: successors to Quanta+
marbux <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:11:40 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.quanta.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJ1g4g9GwZrqTzV40dBHBp=yXGT1Y0SscTAqB-y61Gex5Qe49Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:49 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Beside Aptana I found another good program - Komodo - > which I also test in my kde4 o.suse-12.1: > http://www.activestate.com/komodo-edit > Are there more experiences from others in this list in > comparison between these competitors, which to prefer > as successor to Quanta+? Any proposals? I tested Komodo 1-2 years ago. I liked the GUI and features, but it was so bug-ridden that I experienced frequent data loss and lots of crashes. It also was very slow when loading. It may be that I just tested a bad release and the critical bugs are fixed now, but were I to test again, the major issue I'd be watching would be trouble-free use. I also have not checked for about a year or so on the present state of the proprietary fork of Quanta, Quanta Gold. <http://www.thekompany.com/products/quanta/>. The last time I checked, it was still pretty immature compared to GPL Quanta. But it might be the one I eventually switch to, particularly given that it now runs not only on Linux but also on OS X and Windows. Thus far, I've found no Linux alternative to Quanta that scratches most of my itches, It's a crying shame; the far and away best web development editor I ever found on any platform is now abandonware. (Longer rant omitted about the collective insanity of the KDE development community in the last few years. But I boycott any software that has a KDE Plasma dependency). Best regards to all, Paul