Re: Quanta and xhtml
"Mark A. Taff" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.quanta.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 12:43:12 Aleksey V Lazar wrote: > We have been using XHTML 1.0 Strict and then XHTML 1.1 for about 5 > years now and have no regrets. It encourages cleaner code, separation > of style and presentation and has a number of requirements that > encourage writing accessible (to screen readers, etc.) code. Ditto. I think it greatly promotes semantic markup, separation of presentation from data, accessibility, and (the best part), because it is valid xml, lends itself to being transformed via XSLT. The means that once you get your content into strict XHTML, you may *never* have to manually port that content to another formatting system! I code everything in XHTML Strict 1.0. I love not having to screw with tables, except for the very rare (in the kind of work I do) presenataion of tablular data. Regards, Mark _______________________________________________ Quanta mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta