Re: Who wants to move Quanta forward?

On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 19:39, Arthur Marsh
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Niko Sams wrote, on 28/12/09 04:39:
>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:51, Arthur Marsh
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> To switch to KDE 4.X, I'd need Quanta to run acceptably including the
>>> ftp kioslave.
>>>
>>> I'd like to support moving Quanta towards that goal as a non C++
>>> programmer who is nonetheless happy to compile and build test versions
>>> and file bug reports and even perhaps contribute cash to developers.
>> Hi,
>> what are your use-cases for quanta?
>> Niko
>
> Just some simple personal web-pages.
>
> Quanta can handle strict XHTML 1.1 compliance better than other web page
> editors and allows one to see that the structure of a web page is
> correct, so that an external validator is only needed at the end of an
> editing session rather than several times during the session.
that means you need:
- html code completion
- html validator
- support for html doctypes
All that is unfortunately not yet avaliable, someoe has to pick the
html plugin up.

Niko