Re: The word 'Aesthetic' in digikam
Gilles Caulier <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:05:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.digikam.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHFG6sGisV5OTY3XczWqFbcOf2w+RAFawtJUwnONj4UbQxgKtw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Andrew, I fix i18n with this commit: https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/commit/ea3c7b77f1f34c0c3181ca3b2db818211c568a3f Best Gilles Caulier Le mer. 14 sept. 2022 à 10:02, Andrew Goodbody <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On 13/09/2022 21:56, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Le mar. 13 sept. 2022 à 21:49, Sveinn í Felli <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> While translating digKam, recently some phrases pop up: > >> > >> Detect if the image is aesthetic > >> Aesthetic Detection to classify images using deep learning model > >> > >> To be sure; the term 'aesthetic' is it a general term ('pleasant for the > >> eyes', 'beautiful', etc) > > > > This is the right definition. For more details : > > > > https://phuockhanhle.github.io/jekyll/update/2022/06/19/gsoc-2022.html > > > > Gilles Caulier > > It may be allowable grammar but it is not very idiomatic English and > reads weirdly to me. Better phrases would be either 'Detect if the image > has aesthetic value' or 'Detect if the image is aesthetically pleasing', > > As a side note claiming to be able to make such a subjective decision > seems to be a pretty bold claim. > > Andrew