Re: [digiKam-users] Test data for video ?
Steven Robbins <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Sep 2022 19:58:33 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.digikam.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8159338.NyiUUSuA9g@riemann> |
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 9:29:40 A.M. CDT Gilles Caulier wrote: > Hi Steve, > > The reason is simple : look already the RAW size of the digiKam git > project in gitlab : More than 7 GB. Ah. I never looked at that. Fortunately, the source tarball is only 300MB :-) OK, so back to implementation. In your first response [1] you used the term "git-fs" [2]. In the Phabricator thread from 2021, Ben used the term "Git LFS" [3]. Which one of these are we to use? [1] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2022-September/112259.html [2] https://github.com/g2p/git-fs [3] https://git-lfs.github.com/ Thanks, -Steve
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEy89k8fa3rclNjyokyeVeL63I9LkFAmMrszkACgkQyeVeL63I 9LltrBAAlPxF+4EOQA2zpwHLRqPLN7WhHAbV8j9Y8n46ZYIwe80F8e70amWgngfn +6cL57TxgVCDoCwsa01gDvXdpYnNZ0EXa+ydXsI/fTjxq0uc5VZmu8eWv1cpJq94 B2W0fxif6rN1jO1K9sNIFcyvW6+PjkTJpQSiZXxgvbce9GQj8baFM9h49600jh7u RiTTEalL3nlKm+h1psfHdoQOuP8yaNMEyrAMTl6+1+EE0Rz9CL9pLIuXGBddV9I+ QDMNtON+sEF+SLUCLDCHZZCZSyxJBM7u+gTEMN9m1JAo0nGFwRLdvrB/JXK9DPRp 4Hxe0M50a6rpguaD2RVQX7Z3igOa5EyDGBkTxOHE0hj5Q5kNp1AL4i1o6FyF+9Kc uWpSs+1EyHStThk2ZHjEOchEm7aDbwsR0CuSL4jtaYIdIZXkOg/+G7B/GDfonHMz cWIBiTbfLh+5W3dzeOsHlIOd6W6fnknWGotMXA/5ro+UAvWLq/i8Z2UxyCF1MZu9 9fT11iypeAdBRIlEW62pZSeP9kOr4dVqBxAo8DtoaCs6M9vZ5/iwGqjawkFKZwlr Y9Y13ErNGaw4Y5249wlIaBXnUFkqu2O5u44V0OKQV4NuMGfEpSYE+09Jh/kMIRYP zWxquFnjc0239H8IUG1XFFeXc0+CI7DRT/cM6FqBQyNW5Kw+X5w= =1DY8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----