Re: [digiKam-users] Test data for video ?

Steven Robbins <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Sep 2022 19:58:33 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.digikam.devel
Message-ID <8159338.NyiUUSuA9g@riemann>
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 9:29:40 A.M. CDT Gilles Caulier wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> The reason is simple : look already the RAW size of the digiKam git
> project in gitlab : More than 7 GB.

Ah.  I never looked at that.  Fortunately, the source tarball is only 300MB 
:-)

OK, so back to implementation.  

In your first response [1] you used the term "git-fs" [2].  In the Phabricator 
thread from 2021,  Ben used the term "Git LFS" [3].  Which one of these are we 
to use?

[1] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/2022-September/112259.html
[2] https://github.com/g2p/git-fs
[3] https://git-lfs.github.com/

Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=1DY8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----