Re: digiKam English documentation

I am brand new to the project, so I don=E2=80=99t know if I=E2=80=99m =
allowed to comment or not, but as a developer with over 30 years of =
experience I can say that one of the things that slows adoption of any =
software is poor documentation.  I think the digiKam documentation is =
pretty good, but there=E2=80=99s always room for improvement with =
anything.=20

Gilles or someone much more experienced with the project should comment =
with the final approval, but I don=E2=80=99t see how better =
documentation would do anything but help.

Cheers,
Mike

> On Aug 20, 2024, at 7:49=E2=80=AFPM, Rickey D Chapman =
<[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> I=E2=80=99ve just started using digiKam and it is incredibly well =
done. So I want to thank the whole development team.
>=20
> But I also think the English-language documentation could be improved =
by some grammatical editing. I have forked the documentation, setup =
sphinx-doc and edited the first 6 rst files in the manual. (The edited =
files are still local on my machine as I have not yet figured out how to =
push my changes back to gitlab.)=20
>=20
> But then it occurred to me that maybe you don=E2=80=99t want this type =
of help. So should I continue editing, or stop? And if I continue, is =
there a preference for either a large or small number of files in each =
merge request?
>=20
> Rick Chapman