WindowsOS SHOWFOTO Bugs (performance and control)
[email protected] Mon, 9 Jun 2025 10:00:00 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.digikam.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
------=_NextPart_001_6845ca67_f89_1550b551 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Using the stable 8.3 digikam version on windows 10 64bits (Qt 5), I notice= d something strange in Showfoto only... After viewing one picture (in a window), next/previous/first/last picture = is too slow (from showfoto buttons, or keyboard). Same symptom occurs from = Thumbbar panel. Moreover, the mouse control for thumbbar panel is buggy, on= e simple click then one double click are requiered to view one picture (Nor= mally one simple click select the thumbnail and load picture in the same ti= me). Thumbnails everywhere are correctly loaded. No problems in full screen= mode (fast and control normally). All these defects don't exist for digikam application, as I tested : faste= r, normal control ... Are these bugs for all stable versions (Digikam and/or Qt) ? Installation = file for WindowsOS is heavy for my internet conection, that's why I ask. Thanks for attention, Cordialy =C2=A0 ------=_NextPart_001_6845ca67_f89_1550b551 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div>Hello,</div><div>Using the stable 8.3 digikam version on windows 10 64= bits (Qt 5), I noticed something strange in Showfoto only...</div><div><br>= </div><div>After viewing one picture (in a window), next/previous/first/las= t picture is too slow (from showfoto buttons, or keyboard). Same symptom oc= curs from Thumbbar panel. Moreover, the mouse control for thumbbar panel is= buggy, one simple click then one double click are requiered to view one pi= cture (Normally one simple click select the thumbnail and load picture in t= he same time). Thumbnails everywhere are correctly loaded. No problems in f= ull screen mode (fast and control normally).</div><div><br></div><div>All t= hese defects don't exist for digikam application, as I tested : faster, nor= mal control ...</div><div><br></div><div>Are these bugs for all stable vers= ions (Digikam and/or Qt) ? Installation file for WindowsOS is heavy for my = internet conection, that's why I ask.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for a= ttention, Cordialy</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><= br></div><div>=C2=A0</div> ------=_NextPart_001_6845ca67_f89_1550b551--