Re: DK on MacOS: Homebrew vs. .pkg installer

Gilles Caulier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user
Message-ID <CAHFG6sEUraPXfJz52tU7QLKcJX64ncTbDNxNXGP1a5abdJN+oA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thomas,

I don't know as i don't use Homebrew.

The easy way is to compare the Help/Components Info dialog with both
versions (use the PKG of the 8.8.0 pre-release, it's up-to-date).

Best

Gilles Caulier

Le mer. 20 août 2025 à 09:53, Thomas <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Hi Gilles,
>
> I understand that the PKG is not build with homebrew.
>
> My question is about whether there would be any disadvantages of using
> the homebrew package rather than the PKG?
>
> As mentioned, I see two advantages of using the homebrew package -
> assuming that the user is already using homebrew.
>
> But I fear that there might be some disadvantages.
>
> You mention that the PKG has all features enabled, including
> MySQL/MariaDB, Qt6, Apple Silicon, Latest KDE, ffmpeg, opencv, and HEIF,
> etc. Does this mean that the Homebrew version does not include these? Or
> that it is limited in other ways?
>
>
> BR
>
> Thomas
>
>
> On 2025-08-19 14.23, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The PKG is build with Macports not Homebrew. The PKG has all features
> > enabled, especially the Mysql/Mariadb support. It's compiled with Qt6,
> > support Silicon and always uses last version of Qt and KDE, ffmpeg,
> > Opencv, HEIF frameworks.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > Gilles Caulier
> >
> > Le mar. 19 août 2025 à 14:18, Thomas <[email protected]> a écrit :
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> Having used Digikam on Mac via the official .pkg installer from
> >> digikam.org for several years, I recently noticed that digikam seems to
> >> be available through homebrew as well.
> >>
> >> Do we have an official recommendation/opinion on when to use the .pkg
> >> installer vs. homebrew?
> >>
> >> Using "brew install digikam" seems to me really nice as it will 1)
> >> ensure frequent updates through brew update/brew upgrade, and 2)
> >> (hopefully) ensure a much easier installation process in that the user
> >> does not have to jump through hoops with MacOS security safeguards
> >> against running unsigned applications downloaded from the internet.
> >>
> >>
> >> Are there any drawbacks to using the homebrew package?
> >>
> >> Of course, the .pkg must still be available for users who for whatever
> >> reason do not have homebrew.
> >>
> >>
> >> BR
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.