Re: DK on MacOS: Homebrew vs. .pkg installer
Gilles Caulier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHFG6sEUraPXfJz52tU7QLKcJX64ncTbDNxNXGP1a5abdJN+oA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Thomas, I don't know as i don't use Homebrew. The easy way is to compare the Help/Components Info dialog with both versions (use the PKG of the 8.8.0 pre-release, it's up-to-date). Best Gilles Caulier Le mer. 20 août 2025 à 09:53, Thomas <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi Gilles, > > I understand that the PKG is not build with homebrew. > > My question is about whether there would be any disadvantages of using > the homebrew package rather than the PKG? > > As mentioned, I see two advantages of using the homebrew package - > assuming that the user is already using homebrew. > > But I fear that there might be some disadvantages. > > You mention that the PKG has all features enabled, including > MySQL/MariaDB, Qt6, Apple Silicon, Latest KDE, ffmpeg, opencv, and HEIF, > etc. Does this mean that the Homebrew version does not include these? Or > that it is limited in other ways? > > > BR > > Thomas > > > On 2025-08-19 14.23, Gilles Caulier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The PKG is build with Macports not Homebrew. The PKG has all features > > enabled, especially the Mysql/Mariadb support. It's compiled with Qt6, > > support Silicon and always uses last version of Qt and KDE, ffmpeg, > > Opencv, HEIF frameworks. > > > > Best regards. > > > > Gilles Caulier > > > > Le mar. 19 août 2025 à 14:18, Thomas <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Hello, > >> > >> > >> Having used Digikam on Mac via the official .pkg installer from > >> digikam.org for several years, I recently noticed that digikam seems to > >> be available through homebrew as well. > >> > >> Do we have an official recommendation/opinion on when to use the .pkg > >> installer vs. homebrew? > >> > >> Using "brew install digikam" seems to me really nice as it will 1) > >> ensure frequent updates through brew update/brew upgrade, and 2) > >> (hopefully) ensure a much easier installation process in that the user > >> does not have to jump through hoops with MacOS security safeguards > >> against running unsigned applications downloaded from the internet. > >> > >> > >> Are there any drawbacks to using the homebrew package? > >> > >> Of course, the .pkg must still be available for users who for whatever > >> reason do not have homebrew. > >> > >> > >> BR > >> > >> Thomas > >>