Re: Changing resolution / DPI in BQM

Laurent Espitallier <espitallier.laurent-1tsiiZ//[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 05/10/2025 à 13:00, [email protected] a écrit :

> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 09:43:53 +0200
> From: Remco Viëtor<[email protected]>
> To:[email protected]
> Subject: Re: Changing resolution / DPI in BQM
> Message-ID: <31192391.1r3eYUQgxm@manticore>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On dimanche 5 octobre 2025 09:19:39 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Laurent
> Espitallier wrote:
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> I don't think I've seen a way to change the DPI of an image in the batch
>> queue manager, nor in the G'MIC filters. Have I missed something? If
>> not, do you think it would be easy to implement?
>>
>> Changing the DPI is possible in the image editor.
>>
>> Laurent
> "DPI" just doesn't make sense for an image file, as it doesn't have a physical
> dimension. Strictly speaking, you can't even define a "DPI" for an image file
> (many programs trying to do it anyway doesn't change that).
>
> DPI only makes sense when printing to a physical support, e.g. paper, and then
> you are dealing with three directly coupled values:
> - size in pixels;
> - size in inches/cm:
> - DPI, which is  (size in pixels)/(size in inch), and can be different for
> each direction (hor or vert)...
> And even there, DPI is mostly useful to see if you have enough pixels for
> decent quality (and the optimal DPI depends on the print size: larger prints
> need less DPI).
>
> DPI also makes sense for a printer, as in "I can put so many pixels in an
> inch". To complicate the issue even further, printers can also specify how
> many dots of ink they can put in an inch. But as they often need to put
> several dots per pixel...
>
> TL,DR: DPI is only useful when printing to verify if you reach the required
> quality level.
>
Yet some users find it useful and easier in their workflow to resize 
image by changing dpi (in order to display images to screen, e.g. 300 > 
72 dpi) rather than specifying a number of pixels.

That was implemented in XnView a few years ago 
https://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=43382

Laurent
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.