Re: Changing resolution / DPI in BQM
Laurent Espitallier <espitallier.laurent-1tsiiZ//[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 05/10/2025 à 13:00, [email protected] a écrit : > Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 09:43:53 +0200 > From: Remco Viëtor<[email protected]> > To:[email protected] > Subject: Re: Changing resolution / DPI in BQM > Message-ID: <31192391.1r3eYUQgxm@manticore> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On dimanche 5 octobre 2025 09:19:39 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Laurent > Espitallier wrote: >> Hi everyone! >> >> I don't think I've seen a way to change the DPI of an image in the batch >> queue manager, nor in the G'MIC filters. Have I missed something? If >> not, do you think it would be easy to implement? >> >> Changing the DPI is possible in the image editor. >> >> Laurent > "DPI" just doesn't make sense for an image file, as it doesn't have a physical > dimension. Strictly speaking, you can't even define a "DPI" for an image file > (many programs trying to do it anyway doesn't change that). > > DPI only makes sense when printing to a physical support, e.g. paper, and then > you are dealing with three directly coupled values: > - size in pixels; > - size in inches/cm: > - DPI, which is (size in pixels)/(size in inch), and can be different for > each direction (hor or vert)... > And even there, DPI is mostly useful to see if you have enough pixels for > decent quality (and the optimal DPI depends on the print size: larger prints > need less DPI). > > DPI also makes sense for a printer, as in "I can put so many pixels in an > inch". To complicate the issue even further, printers can also specify how > many dots of ink they can put in an inch. But as they often need to put > several dots per pixel... > > TL,DR: DPI is only useful when printing to verify if you reach the required > quality level. > Yet some users find it useful and easier in their workflow to resize image by changing dpi (in order to display images to screen, e.g. 300 > 72 dpi) rather than specifying a number of pixels. That was implemented in XnView a few years ago https://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=43382 Laurent