Re: Image orientation management
Gilles Caulier <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Dec 2025 07:44:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHFG6sFz00Z_VTk2WdDZxrLZ4_FoVo12zvR76fA44Kt7d3aBww@mail.gmail.com> |
One entry in bugzilla already exists in digiKam bugzilla : https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455775 Gilles Le lun. 8 déc. 2025 à 07:43, Gilles Caulier <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Le sam. 6 déc. 2025 à 19:09, Sylvain MONTAGNER > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > Thanks again for your answers, Gilles. > > > > OK for the orientation field, which concerns the image format (portrait/landscape). > > > > But for the “accuracy” field, I see in the ODS table that it corresponds exactly to what I would expect from this field: “Estimated accuracy of the position (in m)”. > > It would be really nice if this field could be managed by the digiKam interface in edit mode, and if this were reflected by a “radius of uncertainty” on the map. > > Without being a developer (but a cartographer), it seems “fairly simple” to implement (if value is null or zero => point; if value >=1, then a point + a circle around the point, with a radius equal to the value). > > yes, it can be sure... > > > > > I understand that the mapping module is based on KDE's Marble project (https://marble.kde.org/). > > > > But would this feature be better requested on the Marble platform or the digiKam platform? > > No. Marble code is only used to render the map in digiKam. All the > rest, and especially all data stored in the database are managed by > the digiKam code. I think that a file is already referenced in digiKam > bugzilla about this topic. > > Best > > Gilles Caulier