Re: "scan for new items" always scans the entire collection
Maik Qualmann <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:11:13 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.digikam.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The AppImage log looks fine so far, aside from the fact that the color prof= ile=20 isn't being detected=E2=80=94though that=E2=80=99s a separate issue. Why isn't there a log from your Arch version? A debug build isn't necessary= =20 for terminal output. Maik Am Freitag, 17. Juli 2026, 09:17:17 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit schri= eb VAL=C3=8DK=20 Robert: > Hello, >=20 > the 9.2.0 debug AppImage does not show the weird behavior. It correctly=20 > starts, scans for new items for a fraction of a second and is done. I=20 > also tried to refresh one existing folder and it was immediate without=20 > rewriting all image metadata data (logs attached) to the DB like the=20 > Arch extra/digikam 9.1.0-6 does. >=20 > Robert >=20 > On 7/16/26 06:39, Maik Qualmann wrote: >=20 > > Please test the digiKam 9.2.0 pre-release version available here: > > > > > > > > https://files.kde.org/digikam/ > > > > > > > > It includes debug code to investigate the issue further. Please post a > > log > > from a digiKam startup that includes a scan, as described here: > > > > > > > > https://www.digikam.org/contribute/#freezes-and-other-run-time-issues > > > > > > > > Maik > > > > > > > > Am Freitag, 10. Juli 2026, 07:02:28 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit s= chrieb > > VAL=C3=8DK Robert: > >=20 > >> No, > >> > >> > >> > >> a) that disables the whole functionality - detecting new items and alb= ums > >> in the collection b) as I regularly create new albums (folders) I > >> cannot refresh them as they do not exist in Digikam. I have to refresh > >> the whole subtree (folder above them) to let Digikam detect them and it > >> takes almost an hour and the result is almost the same, every existing > >> image in tget path gets scanned again and it=E2=80=99s metadata (abd t= humbnail) > >> are rewritten c) I do import photos from different sources and differe= nt > >> dates so it is quite impossible to know every folder I should refresh > >>=20 > >>> On 9 Jul 2026, at 20:34, Rainer J.H. Brandt<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> =EF=BB=BFDiego writes: > >>>=20 > >>>> In our case (no faces involved), "scan for new items" should only sc= an > >>>> new items; without this option checked, it should scan the entire > >>>> collection. The problem reported here (for DK 9.1.0) is that > >>>> regardless > >>>> of whether you ask to "scan for new items" or not, it will scan the > >>>> entire collection. This is not the expected behavior. > >>>=20 > >>> I use the "Refresh" item of the album context menu, in the album tree > >>> opened from the left edge controls. That only scans the selected alb= um > >>> for new items. Does that work for you? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Cheers, Rainer > > > > > > > > >=20 > --=20 > *Robert Val=C3=ADk* > https://robert.valik.sk/ >=20 > Sent from my MUA