Re: KDE 4.10 or Kde 4.A

The version numbers might be for tech purposes, but many end users actually 
use them to identify their systems (I have never heard anybody say that they 
use the KDE Plasma Desktop version that was released in January 2010, they 
just say KDE Plasma Desktop 4.5). I think that for most users jumping from 4.9 
to 4.A would be confusing and would be perceived as a qualitative change more 
than an incremental one using hex. We could always make an effort to educate 
and communicate, but we have very limited resources and I honestly do not 
think we would gain much. In any case, 4.10 is two-and-a-half years away, so 
we can discuss this again if necessary when we get closer to that release. We 
have a lot of work to do before then!

Oriol


A Dijous 12 Agost 2010 06:51:06, nuno pinheiro va escriure:
> On Thursday 12 August 2010 12:47:52 Agustín Benito wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > are we going to reach KDE 4.10?
> > 
> > If so....since the numbers is something for tech purposes
> > 
> >  (users usually just update their systems)...what about KDE 4.A,
> >  4.B...4.F
> > 
> > it would be funny, maybe not useful, but funny. I hate the 2.26.32 number
> > from the kernel.
> > 
> > saludos
> 
> +1 :) kde 4.A

 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.