Re: KDE 4.10 or Kde 4.A

Torsten Rahn <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <201008151321.35472.tackat__33985.7666906484$1281871334$gmane$org@t-online.de>
No matter what I think it should be consistent with Qt ;-)

And since they'll run into the issue first we can just wait and see ;-)

Oh btw: Marble is at 0.10 already.

Torsten

On Saturday 14 August 2010 22:28:52 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> On Thursday 12 August 2010 16:50:57 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > A and B in version numbers are usually associated with Alpha and Beta.
> > Going hexadecimal just for the sake of being different is counter
> > productive.
> 
> Besides, it would probably break a lot of tools 'out there' in
> distributions ;-)
> 
> So a -1 from me.
> 
> > On Thursday 12 August 2010 13:47:52 Agustín Benito wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > are we going to reach KDE 4.10?
> > > 
> > > If so....since the numbers is something for tech purposes
> > > 
> > >  (users usually just update their systems)...what about KDE 4.A,
> > >  4.B...4.F
> > > 
> > > it would be funny, maybe not useful, but funny. I hate the 2.26.32
> > > number from the kernel.
> > > 
> > > saludos
 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.