Re: KDE 4.10 or Kde 4.A
Torsten Rahn <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <201008151321.35472.tackat__33985.7666906484$1281871334$gmane$org@t-online.de> |
No matter what I think it should be consistent with Qt ;-) And since they'll run into the issue first we can just wait and see ;-) Oh btw: Marble is at 0.10 already. Torsten On Saturday 14 August 2010 22:28:52 Jos Poortvliet wrote: > On Thursday 12 August 2010 16:50:57 Markus Slopianka wrote: > > A and B in version numbers are usually associated with Alpha and Beta. > > Going hexadecimal just for the sake of being different is counter > > productive. > > Besides, it would probably break a lot of tools 'out there' in > distributions ;-) > > So a -1 from me. > > > On Thursday 12 August 2010 13:47:52 Agustín Benito wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > are we going to reach KDE 4.10? > > > > > > If so....since the numbers is something for tech purposes > > > > > > (users usually just update their systems)...what about KDE 4.A, > > > 4.B...4.F > > > > > > it would be funny, maybe not useful, but funny. I hate the 2.26.32 > > > number from the kernel. > > > > > > saludos _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.