Re: My Article on KDE 4

Kunal Deo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Jos

Thanks for your comments. Most of the information presented was derived from
KDE mailing lists and Techbase. For example the language support id derived
from
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials#Other_programming_languages .
And the same goes for GNOME. I agree that I should have consulted the team
first and get the facts straight.

Anyways to remedy this situation I am planning to write an article on "KDE
Project Myths and Facts" to clear out the misconception that people have
about KDE Project in whole. KDE has grown into a larger project with many
goals and directions. Most of the people (even some distros) refer KDE as K
Desktop Environment. I am taking the step here and will try to sort out as
many misconceptions that is spread.   If you (and other kde-promo members)
have anything special in your mind that you want to cover please let me know
I will make sure that I include it in the feature.

Regards
Kunal Deo

On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Wednesday 01 September 2010 09:15:12 Kunal Deo wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have recently written an article about KDE 4 and GNOME. Both from user
> > point of view and a developer's point of view. Also, I think this article
> > could be linked from KDE.org as well.
> >
> > http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/features/gnome-vs-kde/
> >
> http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/tutorials/kde-gnome-cross-desktop-development/
> >
> >
>
> Very good articles, thanks for writing them. Besides what Nuno said (both
> screenshots aren't very 'official', the GNOME one is from Ubuntu which
> heavily modifies GNOME and the KDE one is without desktop effects and has
> some non-stock artwork) let me comment a bit on both of them.
>
> http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/features/gnome-vs-kde/
>
> It might be interesting to note that GNOME and KDE seem to have switched
> places a few times during development. KDE 1 had more of an usability focus,
> due to Matthias Ettrich focussing on that. KDE 2 and 3 focussed more on
> features. GNOME lost that feature race, and turned around (in part thanks to
> SUN investment) towards usability with the 2 series. KDE then turned around
> with the KDE 4 series to look more at usability (while indeed moving
> technology and innovating), while GNOME with GNOME 3 tries to innovate with
> the GNOME shell again.
>
> Their development filosophy is very different: see esp GNOME Shell and
> Plasma for this difference.
>
> Plasma is very much a technology to build desktops upon. It is very
> flexible but the developers choose to re-implement a 'traditional' desktop
> first, to focus on the Plasma Netbook and Mobile interfaces later. The goal
> of Plasma is to allow developers to easily hack and extend it - every
> component is separate and can be replaced with a new one. You can do that in
> a variety of languages - javascript and C++ are recommended but Python, Ruby
> and C# are supported too. And these components, be it widgets, panels or
> backgrounds, work everywhere as they are aware of their surroundings thanks
> to the powerful architecture. GNOME Shell on the other hand is very much a
> 'static' solution implementing the GNOME vision of a good desktop. It can be
> hacked and extended but that is NOT the primary focus. It is written in
> Javascript only, has no widget and barely any applet support - it does what
> it does, but does it well.
>
> The part about supported languages is wrong: both KDE and GNOME support
> many languages. You can write KDE apps in Python, Ruby, C# and Java - there
> are good bindings. Plasma Widgets in particularly can easily be written with
> Javascript.
>
> I think you should note that KDE is technically years ahead of MAC and
> Windows - so obviously also compared to GNOME. The KDE core technologies
> have been adopted in the industry, often through rewrites (D-BUS) but also
> directly through further development (WebKit is based on KHTML).
>
> GNOME has the strongest accessability support, KDE is playing catch-up
> there.
>
> Obviously you can mix the apps from both environments. KDE's Plasma
> Desktop/Netbook/Mobile can work fine with GNOME apps, and GNOME Shell and
> the old GNOME Pannel work fine with KDE apps.
>
> http://www.linuxuser.co.uk/tutorials/kde-gnome-cross-desktop-development/
> Nice, no comments ;-)
>
>


-- 
Kunal Deo
http://kunaldeo.blogspot.com

 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.