Re: Do we release SC or not?
Bernhard Reiter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <201009131436.46609.bernhard__38812.8964965746$1284381441$gmane$org@intevation.de> |
Am Mittwoch, 8. September 2010 21:07:46 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > On Tuesday, September 7, 2010, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > > The only way in my view to actually get people to talk about single KDE > > appliction releases and not about "SC" is that applictions would get > > released independently on a regular basis. > > getting people to talk about single KDE application releases is not the > main goal. the main goal is erase the idea that KDE apps and the platform > require the desktop in some way, to help us move on from being "a desktop" > in the public's mind to being what we actually are: a platform, apps for > desktop, tablets and mobile and primary user interfaces (aka "shells") for > the same. I agree with the goal. I am saying: As long as a common release is made, most publications and people will focus on the whole package. For them it is one package (and one product). So speaking of several single applications when doing a release of the whole bundle will not reach our goal to highlight the non-desktop uses. It might lead to less people reading about KDE. > that it will get people talking more about Marble for Marble's sake is > nice, but not a requirement. > > so i can understand why you come to such conclusions as above, but the > argument is starting from the wrong point. :) Maybe we can do a press release highlight for a single application or even start to promote an application most people not expect to have KDE technology inside or being a KDE application. This idea would avoid having the extra news of the full bundle which certainly will distract some tech writers because there is so much other good stuff in it. > > +1 also on the point that the name for the "compilation" needs to be > > short and the release number will often matter. > > not in a title. the release number is a technical detail. that we release a > compilation is a release engineering thing. we're talking to the public, > they need to be sold on benefit, not "we have a release engineering event > and it is labeled 4.5.2". As you've agreed further down in your reply: Good press releases depend on the target audience. Some KDE fans are engineers, for them engineering event 4.5.2 is the right message, even for the title. > > The idea of having "KDE" be an initiative and thus the people is really > > good and I would accept that now a new suboptimal label is needed for the > > product itself. Using "KDE SC" or "KDE Software Compilation" isn't too > > bad. > > except that the SC is not a product. it's an engineering artifact. products > are "KDE Platform" or "Dolphin". SC is released together, people will understand it as one product as explained above. > > Good press releases depend on the target audience. Most of the time we > > want to reach other multipliers of information, we could provide more > > variants to solve the short versus longer problems. Then journalists > > could pick and we get more exposure. > > agreed; and that's what was done starting with 4.5. Then one could still have the "engineering news" style. > > "KDE" is in a small niche of IT news for many publications, if we would > > only offer longer titles with more KDE application names, this might even > > lower the importance of the news for more mainstream publications. So > > agreed > > > keeping a common label for the release is good. > > sub-optimal conclusion, however, imho. :) We need a label to cater the "engineering news" which is public of course. And I think "KDE SC" is the best we have so far. If you think this is sub-optimal, you need to suggestion a) how we otherwise solve the two challenges that people believe this is one product and one news and b) what label we should use for the public "engineering talk". (I appreciated your reply. :)) Bernhard -- Managing Director - Owner: www.intevation.net (Free Software Company) Deputy Coordinator Germany: fsfe.org. Board member: www.kolabsys.com. Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998 Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkyOGt4ACgkQh9ag3dpKERbW7gCglpfPEyBWjJTKAKmtHo54VvV9 /BoAn0XW2Ooa7L/yIq6KVRrtKRzYB5M8 =ngsS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----