Re: Booklet, version 7

Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <201102021435.30034.jospoortvliet__45466.5637495511$1296653808$gmane$org@gmail.com>
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 14:11:36 Stuart Jarvis wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2011 12:49:27 Felix Michel wrote:
> > the booklet is more or less ready for printing.
> 
> It's awesome :-) I have been watching a little, even though lacking the
> time to contribute.
> 
> > I just have to buy a usb
> > stick and then i will go to a copy shop.
> > 
> > The only thing missing is license part on the cover. For me it is
> > allright to publish the booklet under a CC license. I just dont know how
> > to put all this.
> 
> Legally*, I don't believe we can do this without the explicit permission of
> all contributors. Neither can we attribute copyright to KDE e.V. as on page
> 38 - I never transferred my copyright to KDE e.V. (though I would be happy
> to).
> 
> So, what are our options? Well, copyright is automatically with the
> creators in most countries, so making no mention of copyright at all does
> not mean that there is not any. We can add a notice later once we have
> full agreement. An alternative is 'Copyright 2011, contributors'
> particularly since they are listed on page 2.
> 
> Do any of the images included prevent us from taking this approach?
> 
> Sorry to be a pain at this late stage :-( If this has to be done now - then
> just do it and ignore me. I don't think we need to worry about one of the
> contributors causing problems about copyright. These rights only matter
> when the holders are minded to enforce them :-)

I think everyone will be OK with a CC. Let's just say we go with that unless 
someone speaks up?

> If I can make one more request - on p39 could "KDE Desktop Suite" change to
> just "KDE" or "KDE Software"? What is the KDE Desktop Suite?
> 
> Ultimately of course, we should have the booklet under a CC license
> (CC-by-sa probably) to make future revisions, translations easier. But
> right now, we need to have lots of printed copies for FOSDEM, allowing
> further distribution is not necessary right now.

True, we can go for a quick solution and just print the darn thing :D

> And, in future, we should get prior agreement on any shared docs about
> copyright assignment (to KDE e.V.?) or acceptable licenses on the work we
> produce, much like happens in the wiki.

I think the etherpad could have an mention that all content is CC?

> Cheers,
> Stu
> 
> 
> * from a few years working at the UK Intellectual Property Office - I don't
> claim to be a copyright expert.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
> 
> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set
> digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.

 
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk1JXaEACgkQ+wgQ1AD35iwHzgCfTp+qrJED/DZAoFftnWYYWyDN
ofIAn23yLwEj/fdqk2Ga6DqUAxNW4LjY
=gcZq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.