Re: Booklet, version 7
Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <201102021435.30034.jospoortvliet__45466.5637495511$1296653808$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 14:11:36 Stuart Jarvis wrote: > On Wednesday 02 February 2011 12:49:27 Felix Michel wrote: > > the booklet is more or less ready for printing. > > It's awesome :-) I have been watching a little, even though lacking the > time to contribute. > > > I just have to buy a usb > > stick and then i will go to a copy shop. > > > > The only thing missing is license part on the cover. For me it is > > allright to publish the booklet under a CC license. I just dont know how > > to put all this. > > Legally*, I don't believe we can do this without the explicit permission of > all contributors. Neither can we attribute copyright to KDE e.V. as on page > 38 - I never transferred my copyright to KDE e.V. (though I would be happy > to). > > So, what are our options? Well, copyright is automatically with the > creators in most countries, so making no mention of copyright at all does > not mean that there is not any. We can add a notice later once we have > full agreement. An alternative is 'Copyright 2011, contributors' > particularly since they are listed on page 2. > > Do any of the images included prevent us from taking this approach? > > Sorry to be a pain at this late stage :-( If this has to be done now - then > just do it and ignore me. I don't think we need to worry about one of the > contributors causing problems about copyright. These rights only matter > when the holders are minded to enforce them :-) I think everyone will be OK with a CC. Let's just say we go with that unless someone speaks up? > If I can make one more request - on p39 could "KDE Desktop Suite" change to > just "KDE" or "KDE Software"? What is the KDE Desktop Suite? > > Ultimately of course, we should have the booklet under a CC license > (CC-by-sa probably) to make future revisions, translations easier. But > right now, we need to have lots of printed copies for FOSDEM, allowing > further distribution is not necessary right now. True, we can go for a quick solution and just print the darn thing :D > And, in future, we should get prior agreement on any shared docs about > copyright assignment (to KDE e.V.?) or acceptable licenses on the work we > produce, much like happens in the wiki. I think the etherpad could have an mention that all content is CC? > Cheers, > Stu > > > * from a few years working at the UK Intellectual Property Office - I don't > claim to be a copyright expert. > > _______________________________________________ > This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. > > Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set > digest on or temporarily stop your subscription. _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk1JXaEACgkQ+wgQ1AD35iwHzgCfTp+qrJED/DZAoFftnWYYWyDN ofIAn23yLwEj/fdqk2Ga6DqUAxNW4LjY =gcZq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----