Re: The Future of our Frameworks - Promo POV
"Aaron J. Seigo" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3415925.i2Sufj1GRD__10858.1037297428$1307400535$gmane$org@freedom> |
On Monday, June 6, 2011 20:16:14 Stuart Jarvis wrote: > Is there exact equivalence between what we used to call the Platform and > what is now the Frameworks (right now, I mean - part of the whole point is > that the Frameworks are going to evolve and modularise in future) yes. note that things like kdepimlibs will end up being in there and what was "kdesupport" will no longer be differentiated in that way .. they'll just be more pieces of the Frameworks. > Question 2: > Should we formally announce the change in terminology? In my opinion, being > explicit about the switch to talking about Frameworks (and what we mean > by that) could be useful, but doesn't necessarily need a whole article. > Therefore I'd like to see it in e.g. the Platform 11 Dot story. yes this would be good imho... -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk3tWPkACgkQ1rcusafx20OBIACfZE0MECIG6w/bCASSrJphxGoJ x4cAn2aau1hdE9PrB9YyelvyNT/eFPCs =eyKY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----