Re: Branding checks to upcoming book
Carl Symons <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPu7pzKh3ApV2zwOWmqso+eVAkq0LRXVk344SVGO-EhNyrC25w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Rohan Garg <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome! Most of our content is currently done, but we would love a extra > set of eyes to review our work. It would be awesome if we could contact you > via IRC, the channel is #kde-doc-camp. Editing the book requires you to > signup with booki.cc and then edit the book via this link > : http://www.booki.cc/kde/_edit/ . > If it's not possible for you to come on IRC, we can use email to collaborate > and review stuff. The book will be sent to the publisher at 6 PM PST , but > we can continue editing it after 6PM PST as well. > To everyone else in the KDE Promo team, we think we have fixed most of the > branding issues, could you please review the book here > : http://www.booki.cc/kde/_full/ > Thanks for taking out the time and reviewing our book on such a short > notice. > Regards > Rohan Garg I'm just getting in from another meeting. It's after 6 pst. So you're published and we'll start polishing together. I'm registered at booki. joined #kde-doc-camp. I'm still going to be /away for a while. But it will probably take a while to get the book sorted out anyway. Carl > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Carl Symons <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Rohan Garg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi >> > I believe I should clarify a couple of things that I should have >> > included >> > earlier. >> > < comments inline > >> >> that's cool. I got a bunch of information from Claudia and Ingo. When >> I first heard about your project, I had no background information. >> >> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Carl Symons <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Rohan Garg <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Oh, I'm extremely sorry, the link to the book >> >> > is http://www.booki.cc/kde/_full/ . The content will be finalized >> >> > till 6 >> >> > PM >> >> > PST tomorrow and will be sent to publishing. We can still makfre >> >> > changes >> >> > but >> >> > the first edition of the book won't contain the fixes. Would this be >> >> > enough >> >> > time for you guys to review our work? >> >> > Regards >> >> > Rohan Garg >> >> >> >> Please say why your book is being sent to the publisher at 6:00 p.m. >> >> today (10/20/11). Here's the dilemma I have... >> >> - http://www.booki.cc/kde/_full/ converts to a 42 page odt. The >> >> webpage is not editable in any serious fashion. Google Docs is fine >> >> for some kinds of collaborative editing, but it doesn't work well for >> >> versioning and involvement of multiple editors. >> > >> > The publishing bit is quite different from the conventional publishing, >> > you >> > can publish books via booki to lulu as soon as you are done fixing >> > stuff. >> > So, you can make edits on booki later on as well -> Publish changes to >> > lulu. >> > The book sprint ends at 6 PM PST, which is why it goes to publishing >> > right >> > away. >> >> Yes, I understand all this now. I think it's a fine idea. And I'm >> happy to help. I'm also happy that this is an ongoing project. >> >> > >> >> >> >> - There is a lot of information in the document. And it covers many >> >> areas of effort within KDE. Accuracy is almost certainly compromised. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > The information is extensive because we are just getting started, the >> > aim of >> > the book is not to teach you how to code but why to code for KDE and how >> > to >> > get started to code for KDE, setting up a development environment and >> > sending in patches. >> > >> >> >> >> - The intended audience is not clear. The potential development >> >> categories are listed below. How will this book be distributed? How >> >> does it get into people's hands? Is it published on paper? A website? >> > >> > Lulu offers printing options and the book will be available via the PDF >> > and >> > epub formats from flossmanuals.net >> > >> >> >> >> * Submitting a bug fix >> > >> > We have a very good techbase page on this that we will incorporate into >> > the >> > book >> > >> >> >> >> * Writing a new application powered by KDE >> > >> > Kind of outside the scope of the book. Essentially the book is aimed at >> > teaching beginners the 'tools of the trade' , the community and the >> > technologies behind KDE. How to code has to be learnt by the reader >> > himself >> > by looking at the API's and experimenting. >> >> >> >> * Contributing to an existing project >> > >> > This is covered under multiple chapters, for example, choosing a >> > project, >> > where to look for API docs, what IDE to use and how to submit patches to >> > revieboard. >> > >> >> >> >> * Adding functionality to KDE development libraries >> > >> > Same as above, also covered under the documentation chapter ( How to >> > write >> > API Docs for new stuff ) >> > >> >> >> >> * Writing a new application using KDE tools >> > >> > I don't understand how this is different from "Writing a new application >> > powered by KDE" , could you please elaborate? >> >> I think that all the items preceded by * were taken from your book. >> Looking now, I don't see all them. I did not intend to add anything. >> >> >> >> >> - There are ongoing efforts to recruit people to KDE in many types of >> >> tasks. How does your work complement those efforts? >> >> >> > The main objective is to help people who have no idea where to get >> > started >> > in KDE, choose a project, teach them how to use tools we use everyday, >> > and >> > submit a patch/fix a bug in KDE. At the end of reading this book, the >> > reader >> > will be able submit a patch to the KDE Review Board ( assuming he has >> > had >> > *some* previous coding experience ). Mainly it's aimed at GSoC students >> > but >> > can be easily extended to cover a broader base. Since this was not >> > possible >> > in a 3 day book sprint, our scope was a bit limited. We are going to >> > improve >> > the scope in later editions of the book as well. >> >> This gets clearer knowing what you are creating. Your book will have many >> uses. >> >> > >> >> >> >> From somewhere came the idea that this book was needed. From somewhere >> >> came the idea that it would be published in less than 12 hours from >> >> now. It seems to me that it would be an important consideration of the >> >> project to address meta-issues. Even if that means publishing will be >> >> delayed from what was originally planned. >> > >> > We can easily address this since lulu offers a continuous publication >> > model >> > and there are no 'editions'. >> > >> >> >> >> I would be happy to work on your document if your group will allocate >> >> enough time and involvement for the job to be done well. Otherwise, >> >> I'm not willing to do what seems to me to be less than quality work. I >> >> do not intend to diminish the work of your group on this book nor on >> >> the GSoC projects that y'all have done. >> > >> > All of us do understand that we will need to commit our time for future >> > editions as well, and our decision was based on not a one time short >> > sprint, >> > but something that we will be working on improving continuously in the >> > coming months. >> >> >> >> >> >> My questions and comments were written in ignorance. How it seemed to >> me was that an extensive book needed to be edited in too short of time >> to do the job right. Knowing more about the project, please disregard >> most of what I wrote. >> >> I would now be interested to know what the plan is going forward as it >> applies to reviewing and editing. >> >> Thank you to your team. Claudia sent me a link to the report. It >> sounds like you had an exciting time of hard work. >> >> Carl >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Carl Symons <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Rohan Garg <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi! >> >> >> > We are writing a book at the GSoC Doc Camp sprint in Mountain View >> >> >> > that >> >> >> > gets >> >> >> > new developers started in KDE Software Development and we would >> >> >> > like >> >> >> > you >> >> >> > guys to review our work in order to ensure that we haven't made >> >> >> > any unintentional branding mistakes in the book. The book will be >> >> >> > finalized >> >> >> > till 6 PM PST, so we need your review ASAP. >> >> >> > www.launchpad.net/~rohangarg >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> I love your intentionality. However, 1 1/2 hours to review something >> >> >> is a pretty audacious request. I'm probably the only one available >> >> >> to >> >> >> do this...most people are in Europe or India. One other minor >> >> >> problem...I don't see anything at www.launchpad.net/~rohangarg to >> >> >> review. >> >> >> >> >> >> What is the magic of publishing at 6 PM? >> >> >> Do you prefer now or correct? >> >> >> What is the document that needs to be reviewed? >> >> >> >> >> >> I may have some time to do this in the next short while, but I >> >> >> already >> >> >> made a commitment to help someone with a Kubuntu upgrade to Oneiric. >> >> >> They are sitting in a coffee shop with no computer. I'm not gonna >> >> >> leave them high and dry. And I don't know how long it will take to >> >> >> get >> >> >> them afloat. >> >> >> >> >> >> Please provide more information. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thank you >> >> >> Carl >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.