Re: 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Member Choice Awards KDE News Article

heathmatlock <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <CABAYxNtoTZy_DBzAaEgCPR1vUnPGTy9vVS1OAUn2rNAt2j2kMw__28722.8260924623$1330733892$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
Here's the TechRadar that should be linked to as well:
http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/what-s-the-best-linux-desktop-environment--1045280

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:16 PM, heathmatlock <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, Lydia asked me to write something up concerning the
> LinuxQuestions.org member choice awards, here it is:
>
> The 2011 Members Choice Awards from LinuxQuestions.org(0) wrapped up
> this year and KDE was voted best Desktop Environment of the Year. Many
> users remember others abandoning ship after the initial 4.0 release,
> but now popular opinion has shifted back in favor of KDE. Tech Radar
> agrees and has also declared KDE the best desktop environment, stating
> that the activities manager wows them and the interface doesn't impede
> their execution of simple tasks. Even Chris from the Linux Action Show
> is switching back to KDE!(1) Joking aside, there weren't many reasons
> given for why the users at LinuxQuestions.org chose KDE, but there
> were some complaints from users on why they decided against KDE.
>
> Most KDE advocates are well accustomed to others citing bloat as a
> reason not to use KDE, and the comments left by the forum users seemed
> to have a similar sentiment. I've came to accept that this opinion is
> simply not well formulated. KDE's codebase is slim and modular, it's
> performance is just as good as other desktops(1), and it has the
> underlying codebase to make for an extremely useful, intelligent
> system. The default KDE desktop shipped by most distributions isn't
> going to be suitable for older desktops, but that doesn't mean it
> won't work on older systems. This is a scenario where the statements
> have some truth, even if most of us would know how to remove services
> that hinder performance. But there are still aspects of KDE which some
> Linux users find unsuitable, for instance, Dragon, Kaffeine,
> Konqueror, Kopete, and Krita all lost in their respective categories.
> What can be learned from this situation? What are the expectations for
> these applications, and what do they not find suitable about the KDE
> apps available? These are questions definitely worth pursuing if we
> want KDE software to retain and improve upon its relevancy to desktop
> users.
>
> Two individual applications did come away as winners this year. Amarok
> scored the Audio Media Player of the Year award and Dolphin was
> selected as the best file manager. Congratulations to these teams and
> all the clever individuals working together to make KDE the best
> desktop available in 2011!
>
>
> (0) http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-news-59/2011-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-award-winners-928502/
>
> (1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-1iYRkYtyxA#t=1095s
>
> (2) Gaming/Graphics Performance of several Desktop Environments:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1204_desktops
> Note compositing may have been turned on, and if it was, this speaks
> volumes concerning the amount of bloat KDE truly contains. See also
> Martin Gräßlin's comments concerning these benchmarks:
> http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2012/02/about-compositors-and-game-rendering-performance/
>
>
> --
> Here are some nice graphs to possibly include with the article:
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2011mca.php
> --
> Heath Matlock
> +1 256 274 4225



-- 
Heath Matlock
+1 256 274 4225

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.