Re: 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Member Choice Awards KDE News Article
heathmatlock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABAYxNtoTZy_DBzAaEgCPR1vUnPGTy9vVS1OAUn2rNAt2j2kMw__28722.8260924623$1330733892$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
Here's the TechRadar that should be linked to as well: http://www.techradar.com/news/software/operating-systems/what-s-the-best-linux-desktop-environment--1045280 On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:16 PM, heathmatlock <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Lydia asked me to write something up concerning the > LinuxQuestions.org member choice awards, here it is: > > The 2011 Members Choice Awards from LinuxQuestions.org(0) wrapped up > this year and KDE was voted best Desktop Environment of the Year. Many > users remember others abandoning ship after the initial 4.0 release, > but now popular opinion has shifted back in favor of KDE. Tech Radar > agrees and has also declared KDE the best desktop environment, stating > that the activities manager wows them and the interface doesn't impede > their execution of simple tasks. Even Chris from the Linux Action Show > is switching back to KDE!(1) Joking aside, there weren't many reasons > given for why the users at LinuxQuestions.org chose KDE, but there > were some complaints from users on why they decided against KDE. > > Most KDE advocates are well accustomed to others citing bloat as a > reason not to use KDE, and the comments left by the forum users seemed > to have a similar sentiment. I've came to accept that this opinion is > simply not well formulated. KDE's codebase is slim and modular, it's > performance is just as good as other desktops(1), and it has the > underlying codebase to make for an extremely useful, intelligent > system. The default KDE desktop shipped by most distributions isn't > going to be suitable for older desktops, but that doesn't mean it > won't work on older systems. This is a scenario where the statements > have some truth, even if most of us would know how to remove services > that hinder performance. But there are still aspects of KDE which some > Linux users find unsuitable, for instance, Dragon, Kaffeine, > Konqueror, Kopete, and Krita all lost in their respective categories. > What can be learned from this situation? What are the expectations for > these applications, and what do they not find suitable about the KDE > apps available? These are questions definitely worth pursuing if we > want KDE software to retain and improve upon its relevancy to desktop > users. > > Two individual applications did come away as winners this year. Amarok > scored the Audio Media Player of the Year award and Dolphin was > selected as the best file manager. Congratulations to these teams and > all the clever individuals working together to make KDE the best > desktop available in 2011! > > > (0) http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-news-59/2011-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-award-winners-928502/ > > (1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-1iYRkYtyxA#t=1095s > > (2) Gaming/Graphics Performance of several Desktop Environments: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1204_desktops > Note compositing may have been turned on, and if it was, this speaks > volumes concerning the amount of bloat KDE truly contains. See also > Martin Gräßlin's comments concerning these benchmarks: > http://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2012/02/about-compositors-and-game-rendering-performance/ > > > -- > Here are some nice graphs to possibly include with the article: > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2011mca.php > -- > Heath Matlock > +1 256 274 4225 -- Heath Matlock +1 256 274 4225 _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.