Re: KDE-Promo Repository

heathmatlock <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <CABAYxNv3FHYXoOji8XwC=n0LGwmSYDPYeDP8DbuOsRU4keoK2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Carl Symons <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In theory, a repository makes sense.
>
> In practice, we have done little of the kind of activity that calls
> for such a repository. Often we use an etherpad at notes.kde.org to
> collaborate on words and then take the final version wherever it needs
> to go. Most Dot stories come from the "Contribute a Story" link on
> dot.kde.org. I will probably not use such a repository much.

Noted, it's difficult because I've become so dependent on version
control for even minute tasks, but I can see how it might become
inconvenient changing the current workflow.

> Generally we get nearly complete Dot stories and then review and edit
> them to fit the Dot tone...such as what happened with the article with
> your byline. The original author gets the credit. I read your comments
> and get the communication.

There was some nice editing which made it read more like a story
instead of a rant in parts. :)

> We are not interested in generating comments just for the sake of more
> activity. The Dot is intended for KDE news that primarily supports
> those who are doing the work. There are other KDE venues for bug
> reporting and forum-type stuff. Over the past few months, we've been
> looking for the proper balance with comments.

Noted to self for future submissions.


--
Heath Matlock
+1 256 274 4225

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.