Re: No more talking about Nepomuk to end users

Myriam Schweingruber <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <CAGzoOB96FfNE+OdWH8OXJjrZmuNwVPesEBuA8vQKy+_uZmHGjw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all,

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]> wrote:
> Heya,
>
> In KDE PIM (during the meeting last year in Osnabrück) it was decided that
> it would make sense to stop talking about Akonadi to the public. First of
> all, because Akonadi has gotten a bad rep and second, because it's a
> technical detail that makes no sense for end users.
>
> Work has been put in to remove mentions of Akonadi (and Nepomuk) from the
> KDE PIM UI and to refer instead to the 'KDE PIM backend'.
>
> I don't remember how much, if at all, this was discussed here. I think I
> wrote a mail but that's probably it. If so I'd hereby like to propose to do
> the same to Nepomuk. It's a technical detail and in announcements and the
> like it shouldn't be discussed. It's fine for blogs and other developer
> centric communication.
>
> I already wrote the announcement this way, not thinking about the fact that
> this was never discussed, and noticed somebody added 'Nepomuk' to all
> mentions of the 'semantic storage backend'. Noticing how uncomfortable it
> looks to talk about "nepomuk (semantic storage and search backend)" or
> "semantic storage and search backend (nepomuk)", I thought this might be a
> good time :D
>
> As far as I can tell, this change has already been done in a few places in
> the UI: I see the applet mention 'search', 'desktop search' or 'search
> service'. The menu of the applet still mentions 'Nepomuk controller' and the
> window shows 'Nepomuk Repository details', as does the control module (which
> is, however, for 'desktop search') so it'd be nice to have Vishesh and other
> Nepomuk devs on board on this to start change this in the UI as well.
>
> What do others think?

That will only cause a problem: there are other services using
Nepomuk, not just KDE PIM. We only just started shipping Amarok with
the Nepomuk plugin, and I am sure that calling that a KDE PIM backend
is just wrong. You will have to find a better name, I don't think
KDE-PIM backend is a suitable name at all.


Regards, Myriam

-- 
Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community
Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE:
http://www.fsfe.org
Please don't send me proprietary file formats,
use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300)

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.