Re: No more talking about Nepomuk to end users
Myriam Schweingruber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGzoOB96FfNE+OdWH8OXJjrZmuNwVPesEBuA8vQKy+_uZmHGjw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi all, On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]> wrote: > Heya, > > In KDE PIM (during the meeting last year in Osnabrück) it was decided that > it would make sense to stop talking about Akonadi to the public. First of > all, because Akonadi has gotten a bad rep and second, because it's a > technical detail that makes no sense for end users. > > Work has been put in to remove mentions of Akonadi (and Nepomuk) from the > KDE PIM UI and to refer instead to the 'KDE PIM backend'. > > I don't remember how much, if at all, this was discussed here. I think I > wrote a mail but that's probably it. If so I'd hereby like to propose to do > the same to Nepomuk. It's a technical detail and in announcements and the > like it shouldn't be discussed. It's fine for blogs and other developer > centric communication. > > I already wrote the announcement this way, not thinking about the fact that > this was never discussed, and noticed somebody added 'Nepomuk' to all > mentions of the 'semantic storage backend'. Noticing how uncomfortable it > looks to talk about "nepomuk (semantic storage and search backend)" or > "semantic storage and search backend (nepomuk)", I thought this might be a > good time :D > > As far as I can tell, this change has already been done in a few places in > the UI: I see the applet mention 'search', 'desktop search' or 'search > service'. The menu of the applet still mentions 'Nepomuk controller' and the > window shows 'Nepomuk Repository details', as does the control module (which > is, however, for 'desktop search') so it'd be nice to have Vishesh and other > Nepomuk devs on board on this to start change this in the UI as well. > > What do others think? That will only cause a problem: there are other services using Nepomuk, not just KDE PIM. We only just started shipping Amarok with the Nepomuk plugin, and I am sure that calling that a KDE PIM backend is just wrong. You will have to find a better name, I don't think KDE-PIM backend is a suitable name at all. Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300) _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.