Re: Notes from Frameworks5 Promo BoF at Akademy
Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAABAGrV_Pb2RseJoVWkv6pt2k27xq6FhVYEROWyTVmZ4rnRYpg__30084.3724202879$1376150712$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
So, with Frameworks out of the CC, let's do this preparation. I think the Frameworks 5 Preview should be announced PERFECTLY. It is a great opportunity and the entire Qt and if possible C++ world should know about it. How about this plan (parts adopted from how we release stuff in openSUSE): T-14 before the release date, we publish an article about what is coming so our own community knows. Focus on importance for the rest of our applications/workspaces, less on the Qt ecosystem value. Should be properly promoted over social media, of course. T-14 With that, we put a countdown up on as many of our sites as we can - kde.org, planet, dot, ??? and ask people to put it on their blogs. T-7 before the release date, we send a press kit with the announcement, background info and some quotes from 'important people' to the press on our press list so they know this is coming and can write an article. We offer them the opportunity for interviews with some key people. The announcement should obviously be well written and include a quote from the Qt Project (Lars, perhaps). Focus should be more on Qt ecosystem value. We don't need to sell it to our own community... Maybe have quotes from some top companies in the Qt ecosystem: KDAB, Digia, ICS. We give the press a more exhaustive description of what we'll be releasing, try to illustrate how well tested/cross platform/documented it is etc. Focus on ThreadWeaver and KArchive as examples that are ready-to-go. T-2 The inqlude website is published two days before the release, coming with a short dot article to further build anticipation. It should contain some roadmap/info about the status of the modules. We send the press a reminder (and notify them that the site is updated and contains interesting content). We promote this also over social media. T-2 We prepare some social media messages for T-0: the release itself (~120 characters, including link, so it can be retweeted as a whole) and some messages later pointing to the released parts KArchive and ThreadWeaver. T-0 On release day (I propose a Wednesday), we let this go out on the dot, inqlude.org and the KDE announce ML; Qt Project does a press release on it and it is featured on the Digia Qt site and the Qt project site. T+5 We try to get a dot article out about the value of Frameworks for our own community - where things stand, when they should start porting etc. (combined with the initial article 2 weeks before the release this should make up for the fact that our announcement was directed at the wider Qt world). Note that some of the above requires us to get help from the Qt project and ideally Digia, KDAB and ICS. I think we can get that if we ask in time and give them what to publish. What else could we do? /J On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Kevin Ottens <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wednesday 07 August 2013 14:03:54 Jos Poortvliet wrote: >>> On Wednesday 31 July 2013 12:54:53 Jos Poortvliet wrote: >>> > Heya, >>> > >>> > I know it's late and perhaps somebody already send these, but if not, here >>> > they are: the notes of the Frameworks5Communication BoF at Akademy 2013. >>> > >>> > I will just link to the notes, as that's the easiest for all - and it can >>> > be edited with further insights. >>> > https://notes.kde.org/p/Frameworks5Communication >>> > >>> > Something I'd like to highlight is the proposal I made to try and release >>> > one or two parts of Frameworks as soon as we can (without giving in on >>> > quality) as a 'teaser' for people. It would help tremendously with >>> > building >>> > up excitement around Frameworks 5 and in garnering interest and perhaps >>> > even help from the Qt community. It was suggested that Treadweaver and >>> > Karchive might be ready for a 1.0 (5.0?) in December. >>> > >>> > This does of course influence scheduling, and the added request to have a >>> > good status overview of the various modules probably adds to that. >>> > >>> > Thoughts? >>> >>> I have not seen any replies to this. Can and should we do an early release >>> of one or more modules? If so, which, when, how? KDE Promo would then have >>> to prepare this - we can and should make a big bang with this. >> >> Well I got the feeling you answered to that in your own email already. :-) >> >> Targets for early releases are KArchive and ThreadWeaver in december. If Alex >> feels like it we could add Solid to this list I think... but that'd require a >> bit push on the Windows and Mac support, would make a splash though. > > Ok, if it's determined that KArchive and ThreadWeaver will be released > by then, we can start preparing. > > Cheers, > J > >> Regards. >> -- >> Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net >> >> Sponsored by BlueSystems and KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.