Re: 4.12 release: we need your help!!!
Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <36492660.pNAuzMEgCd__25314.6290932365$1386525873$gmane$org@xps> |
El Dissabte, 7 de desembre de 2013, a les 22:03:05, Jos Poortvliet va escriure: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > > El Dijous, 5 de desembre de 2013, a les 15:08:35, Jos Poortvliet va escriure: > >> So, after some conversation on IRC and writing/editing, the text is on > >> https://notes.kde.org/p/release_4.12 > >> it has three sections: > >> * the dot article (written by unormal, edited by me) > >> * the text for http://kde.org/announcements/4.12 - mix of the dot > >> article and some text by me > >> * the text for http://kde.org/announcements/4.11/applications.php - > >> simply the list made by Mario turned into text > > > > Some comments: > > * We are *not* releasing kde-workspace so i think that: > > - "The upgrades in version numbers for the Workspaces and Platform are > > > > merely for the convenience of packaging." should be "The upgrades in > > version numbers for the Platform are merely for the convenience of > > packaging." > Ok, didn't know that. For my information, why do we release upgraded > numbers of the Platform but not for Workspaces? Because verion number upgrade for platform is not "merely a convenience" for packaging, we have lots of stuff in other modules that use definitions from kdelibs to set the version numbering, so we need to update it. kde-workspace otoh lives in it's own world. > > > - "All bug fixes and minor features developed since the release of > > Plasma > > > > Workspaces, Applications and Platform 4.11 have been included." should not > > be there > > Ok, so that goes. > > > - The "Plasma Workspaces Continue Bugfixing" section should not be > > there > > Idem. > > > * "KDE Platform 4.12 Becomes More Stable" is against the idea that the > > > > kdelibs 4.11 == 4.12 because how can it become more stable if it's the > > same > > thing with just a new version number? Note that I can confirm that > > KDE/4.12 > > and KDE/4.11 are not exactly the same, since git diff shows a few > > differences, so not sure how to articulate this kdelibs being frozen but > > not really :D > It did get about 20 bugfixes, since 4.11.0, although I guess they have > been rolled into 4.11.x too. Hope so :-) > And we did this for 4.11 and 4.10 etc > too, talking about it while it was frozen... Yeah, this has been a bit > inconsistent, and now it will get more inconsistent with the > workspaces not going to a new number unlike the Platform. I guess we > should have thought about this at some point... > > I thought the most consistent thing would be to continue with the > platform as we have (which is, upgrading the release number and to > talk about its bugfixes and minor features, if any, while pointing out > that it's frozen) and do the same thing for the Workspaces - > numbering-up and talking about it but no separate page. > > But as we don't number up the Workspaces (?) that makes it a bit > complicated. Should we skip talking about it altogether, or mention > its bugfixes went into the minor releases? Perhaps even explain why we > treat the platform different from the workspaces? The rationale is simple, we promised kde-workspace 4.11 to be LTS and we're keeping that promise. If we want to mention it or not, i'll leave that to you, personally I would not go besides what the rest of 4.12 announcements have "This release does not include Plasma Workspaces since it was frozen for new features in 4.11.x. " but if you find a nicer non confusing way to put it, i'm all for it. Cheers, Albert > > > The rest seems good, maybe the list of app improvements a little too long > > but i guess it's good we put more people into the spotlight :-) > > Ah, as long as the announcement on the dot/mail isn't too long, it > doesn't matter that we HAVE more detail for those interested... > > /J > > > Cheers, > > > > Albert > >> > >> It can all use some review and pictures are missing. I hope this was > >> helpful, I would like to now turn some of my attention to writing an > >> announcement of Frameworks 5 Technology Preview: > >> https://notes.kde.org/p/Frameworks5TechPreviewAnnounce > >> > >> Hugs, > >> J > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Mario Fux KDE ML <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > >> >> Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2013, 11.26:08 schrieb Mario Fux KDE ML: > >> >>> Morning > >> >> > >> >> Morning > >> >> > >> >>> Here is the start and the coordination: > >> >>> https://notes.kde.org/p/release_4.12 > >> >>> > >> >>> Add as much information you know and can. > >> >> > >> >> I had a short chat with Carl on IRC and I'm planning to start a text > >> >> according to: > >> >> http://dot.kde.org/2013/08/14/411-release-plasma-workspaces-applicatio > >> >> ns-> >> and- development-platform tomorrow on my train to work and > >> >> back. > >> > > >> > Should I still go in and edit in that doc, or not? > >> > > >> >> Best > >> >> Mario > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. > >> >> > >> >> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, > >> >> set > >> >> digest on or temporarily stop your subscription. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. > >> > >> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set > >> digest on or temporarily stop your subscription. _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.