Re: Plasma Next Naming

Why do we have to start with A? I guess we can (at least for the first
release name) find the name of the fish that better represent the
characteristic of Plasma 2 . Like a fish that is fast and pretty to look
at, or maybe rare but wanted because is good.
All other release can go in alphabetical order or not, why do we have to,
if we also have the version year and month that tells us the chronology?
Only because Kubuntu does that? I think it is limiting, I suggest to stick
with a marine name but forget the alphabetical order, or at least the
starting point being A.

Cheers
Marco


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Ivan Čukić <[email protected]> wrote:

> > "KDE releases the January Update to the October 2014 release of Plasma"
> > "October 2014, january update"
>
> This is a mouthful, and even more, quite confusing.
>
> While I like the month/year idea (duh:)), this is kinda breaking the aims
> we previously defined.
>
> Cheerio,
> Ivan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
>
> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set
> digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
>



-- 
Life is short, so learn from your mistakes
And stand behind, the choices that you make

Face each day with both eyes open wide
And try to give don't keep it all inside

                                               Dream Theater


_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.