Re: Plasma Next Naming

Algot Runeman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <52DFD9CD.3040206__40338.6421887719$1390402042$gmane$org@verizon.net>
On 01/22/2014 09:13 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [please keep plasma-devel cq. kde-promo in CC:]
>
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 15:03:20 Markus Slopianka wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 22. Januar 2014, 10:56:02 schrieb Martin Gräßlin:
>>> We made it always quite clear that this is a working title
>> No, you didn't. *I* know that it was meant to be a working title but it was
>> not always made clear in public communication.
> You know, an incomplete quote is not going to help in this discussion:
>
> Martin wrote:
>> We made it always quite clear that this is a working title - at least it was
>> always quite clear to us.
> The latter part is highly relevant here. Maybe removing it makes it easier to
> get your point across, but accuracy is quite important as well.
>
>> Quite frankly I cannot understand how you could have read my mail, which
>> includes links to four articles, and still claim that the working title
>> disclaimer has always been put in them...
> To me, it was always clear that it's a working title.
>
> Besides, out of 4 articles you link to, two don't even have "Plasma 2" in them
> (there's "Plasma Workspaces 2", which we don't want for other reasons).
>
> Most importantly: We are free to change the name, and given there are good
> reasons for it, and we haven't invested a lot in "Plasma 2" as a name, to me
> it's completely fine.
>
> In the professional world, the final name is almost never the same as the
> working title, it even can give some extra boost to the actual release.
>
> Bottom line: we can go on discussing this for ages, what we need is a decision
> (which we've proposed, and which has been further refined). Taking a few steps
> back and going over the same discussion again is not going to get any work
> done, it's just hindering.
>
> Cheers,
Plasma (by KDE) is the user-visible brand. Whether it is the fourth 
update to the 2014 release is technical to me. I'm a user of the KDE 
software product. I'm impressed with the underlying technologies, but 
engage with them mainly because they become available in my distribution 
upgrade channels. I get to benefit when the changes are positive and am 
occasionally bothered when some sort of glitch shows up.

Plasma, with a "turbo boost, semi-hemi engine" or whatever. The extra 
information is marketing which might make me seek out the software.

Version numbers are informational, indicating the maturity of a 
particular installation. With backports, etc. even that can become confused.

But "KDE's latest update of Plasma is available today for your computer, 
your laptop, your tablet, your smart-wrist-bangel...Look for it in your 
favorite distribution soon." Adding the details for the excitement and 
education of users comes next.

Good luck. Keep the good work coming. I love the stuff I can do with my 
Plasma powered laptop (thanks to the hard work of the KDE community).

--Algot

-- 
-------------------------
Algot Runeman

[email protected]
Web Site: http://www.runeman.org
Twitter: http://twitter.com/algotruneman/
Open Source Blog: http://mosssig.wordpress.com
MOSS SIG Mailing List: http://groups.google.com/group/mosssig2


_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.