Re: Plasma Next Naming

Mark Gaiser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <CAPd6JnH5OYmOtGRPQGMbQMqqVGwEoTjOTSD49yLJBCfoe-JBPA__29486.6676944823$1390511041$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Martin Klapetek
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Mark Gaiser <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It just shows that not everyone is happy with the initial proposal.
>>
>> "The next version of plasma" has always been made public under the names:
>> - PW2
>> - Plasma Workpaces 2
>> - Plasma 2
>>
>> Yes, we right now have "Plasma 4.xx"
>> We call it "Plasma". We hardly ever put a version behind it.
>>
>> I really think it makes perfect sense to just call it "Plasma 2". It's
>> very much in the direction you folks (those blogging about plasma)
>> have always named it. To me it just doesn't make much sense to
>> suddenly entirely drop that de facto new name for "Plasma June/2014"
>> or "Plasma Angelfish <date>" or whatever the order is.
>
>
> Let me give a different example from the same area - do you remember Windows
> Longhorn? Everyone was talking about "Longhorn" always and how revolutionary
> and new it will be...and then, Windows Vista came out. From the very same
> company, Windows Vienna turned into Windows 7. And many others could be
> found.

The comparison isn't fair.
The name change from Longhorn to Vista had cost Microsoft billions!
Literally. The change from Vienna to 7 wasn't that big of a deal since
it was already mostly known as windows 7 before it became the official
name.

Big company's can pull these stunts. They have the marketing budget.
We - KDE - can't pull that stunt. There is no marketing capital like
those big company's have. We need to slowly build momentum starting
from the very first blog about a new piece of software and sticking to
it's name or change it slightly. But the general structure should
remain the same i think.

>
> So "suddenly entirely dropping de facto (public) names" is not that uncommon
> in our area and I personally think it's not unreasonable to drop working
> names either. Think of it as developers working with some name because they
> need to call it somehow, then when they are done, the marketing phase starts
> and the marketing people think of a new name for it. And we could sell the
> new name exactly like this - "Unveiling the final Plasma by KDE", done.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Martin Klapetek | KDE Developer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.