Re: Plasma Next Naming - Take 2

On Monday 27 January 2014 21:45:48 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> 2014-01-27 Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]>:
> > El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 15:05:43, Jos Poortvliet va 
escriure:
> >> I recall seeing -x often as distro-package-versions, so 2014.06.2 might
> >> be
> >> better. Then the fourth packaging of 2014.06.2 will be 2014.06.2-4.
> > 
> > Just after reading the email I also thought that 2014.06.2 looks "more
> > consistent" than 2014.06-2, on the other hand 2014.06.2 may "easily" be
> > confused with a date while 2014.06-2 not so much, so I'm not really sure
> > what I like better :D
> 
> I just want to see this thread to end :P
> 
> so maybe (because indeed distros use -X as their packaging versions):

that distros use -X as their packaging versions doesn't matter. We can use:
2014.06-1
and distros can turn it into:
2014.06-1-2-distro-5

what matters is that the version number increases. And that's still the case.

What we should consider when using such a numbering scheme is that it also 
works with beta releases of Plasma Next. If we kind of stick to what we use 
today it could be.
2014.06-90 for the beta release of Plasma Next with the last stable release 
having been in June 2014.

Cheers
Martin


_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlLnbMwACgkQqVXwidMiVroOvACghje6NLiD9ojZIbdqdunQlhWl
npcAoJu4QM2SwzcWEUoNi4bUhChyYP/N
=duSq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----