Re: Article about Baloo

Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <CAABAGrXmSQ7iDMbopEP-mOKbJB2-OaE0gk5Qsr1At6tSQUqUfA__49370.7813475796$1392790275$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
On Feb 18, 2014 10:49 PM, "David Edmundson" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> I think the important thing is to remember is that the promo team
> should be using their relevant expertise to help the developer achieve
> the promotional goals the developer has, I'm concerned that due to
> Vishesh's lack of availability we risk accidentally imposing our own
> agenda.
>
> Vishesh gave me the distinct impression that he wanted to put some
> distance between Nepomuk and Baloo. Vishesh certainly isn't stupid and
> I'm sure well aware of the pros and cons to both approaches, we
> discussed them at length in the office on many occasions. Vishesh is
> certainly going to have the best awareness of the public perception of
> Nepomuk out of any of us here and probably knows best.

This is essentially arguing between 'promo' (promote the heck out whatever
brainfart a KDE developer comes up with) and marketing (pro-actively
developing our brand). While the room for the latter is limited in a
community as open as ours and I once argued even that there is none, I now
do believe there is and should be room for that. Our rebranding was a first
example (at least for me personally) but there is more.

> Personally, I think it is a mistake to continue pushing Nepomuk on the
> premise that we have already put a lot of effort into branding
> Nepomuk. It's a very deliberate change of tact in the code and IMHO
> that should be reflected in how we publish it.

Not perse. A brand is separate from code to a very great degree and we
shouldn't feel forced to change brands upon code changes. While it isn't a
total disconnect I can't think of a reason why we can't decide to
rename-or-not based on pure marketing reasons here.

And yes, vishesh should have a say, but he is smart enough to also listen
to folks who do indeed know more about *marketing* than he does.

I will discuss this with him in person and yes, I feel the backend idea is
a very good one, all things considered.

> Knowing the codebase somewhat, the design objectives between the two
> are very different; there is no semantic linking between objects, just
> independent fast search stores in various places. I think it's
> important that developers to see them as being different so they do
> re-evaluate it's usefulness for their project. From a developer point
> of view, they are very different.
>
> Lets check our goals align with Vishesh's before we try and come up
> with a plan on how to achieve it.
>
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
>
> Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set
digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.


_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.