Re: Article about Baloo
Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAABAGrXmSQ7iDMbopEP-mOKbJB2-OaE0gk5Qsr1At6tSQUqUfA__49370.7813475796$1392790275$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
On Feb 18, 2014 10:49 PM, "David Edmundson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the important thing is to remember is that the promo team > should be using their relevant expertise to help the developer achieve > the promotional goals the developer has, I'm concerned that due to > Vishesh's lack of availability we risk accidentally imposing our own > agenda. > > Vishesh gave me the distinct impression that he wanted to put some > distance between Nepomuk and Baloo. Vishesh certainly isn't stupid and > I'm sure well aware of the pros and cons to both approaches, we > discussed them at length in the office on many occasions. Vishesh is > certainly going to have the best awareness of the public perception of > Nepomuk out of any of us here and probably knows best. This is essentially arguing between 'promo' (promote the heck out whatever brainfart a KDE developer comes up with) and marketing (pro-actively developing our brand). While the room for the latter is limited in a community as open as ours and I once argued even that there is none, I now do believe there is and should be room for that. Our rebranding was a first example (at least for me personally) but there is more. > Personally, I think it is a mistake to continue pushing Nepomuk on the > premise that we have already put a lot of effort into branding > Nepomuk. It's a very deliberate change of tact in the code and IMHO > that should be reflected in how we publish it. Not perse. A brand is separate from code to a very great degree and we shouldn't feel forced to change brands upon code changes. While it isn't a total disconnect I can't think of a reason why we can't decide to rename-or-not based on pure marketing reasons here. And yes, vishesh should have a say, but he is smart enough to also listen to folks who do indeed know more about *marketing* than he does. I will discuss this with him in person and yes, I feel the backend idea is a very good one, all things considered. > Knowing the codebase somewhat, the design objectives between the two > are very different; there is no semantic linking between objects, just > independent fast search stores in various places. I think it's > important that developers to see them as being different so they do > re-evaluate it's usefulness for their project. From a developer point > of view, they are very different. > > Lets check our goals align with Vishesh's before we try and come up > with a plan on how to achieve it. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. > > Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription. _______________________________________________ This message is from the kde-promo mailing list. Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.