Re: [kde-artists] We need a Vision!

Björn Balazs <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <2639135.Q5nrSs0bVf__16139.5065756098$1394710865$gmane$org@rechenknecht>
Am Donnerstag, 13. März 2014, 11:42:20 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> On Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:55:09 Björn Balazs wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 11. März 2014, 23:57:57 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > > On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 14:55:13 Björn Balazs wrote:
> > impossible to reach them. We do have contact to all users - because we are
> > delivering software to them.
> 
> Not really; we write software, but we rarely do the actual delivery.
> 
> Others take that software, package it and deliver it to their end users with
> no interface to us. When I was traveling between events around the world
> promoting KDE (at one point, twice a month on average) I routinely ran into
> groups doing exactly this whom we had (and in many cases, continue to have)
> little to no contact with.
> 
> So people are using things we make, but there are middlemen between the end
> users and us with a disconnect between us and those middlemen. These same
> middlemen often change how the software is presented to suit their own ideas
> and the needs of their audience.
> 
> Is it possible to build a communication channel between our global user base
> and KDE? Perhaps, though I am skeptical given the nature of how software
> KDE writes gets into the hands of people. Assuming it is possible, it will
> take years to accomplish as it would mean working both with the various
> middlemen involved and likely putting new features into our software that
> will take years to reach our full audience. (Not everyone upgrades every
> release, or even annually ..)
> 
> Assuming we want a vision statement this year, I think one needs to be
> realistic about that.

Agreed. This obviously is a rather long term goal - but worth working on it - 
even though this should be done in a different discussion. We have to work 
with what we have at the moment - always beeing aware of the limitations.

> > experiences. So we could e.g. ask what they associate with KDE or how KDE
> > needs to turn in order to have their mother / girlfirend / ... use it.
> > Then
> 
> The former question is valid, the latter question will get you noise. When
> asked a question, people will give an answer, regardless of whether they are
> in a position to do so with any factual basis or useful insight. This is
> the nature of surveying people (my wife does it for a living, as do many of
> our mutual friends .. it's an interesting, and difficult, thing to get
> useful information out of people by asking questions.)
> 
> What we could do is learn about the people who do use KDE and about those
> who we would like to use KDE. We'd still need to formulate a "how to get X
> to use KDE software.." based on that, however.
> 
> The surveying alone is a task that is likely to take the better part of a
> year to get useful results.

Again agreed. The questions were rather quick examples than actual candidates 
for the survey. And concerning the timeframe: This is why we want to start 
now. Things are not getting better (or easier) when we wait :)

In order to focus the discussion again and stop the cross postings: Who would 
I have to ask to create a seperate KDE-Vision-Mailinglist? Or should we rather 
do the discussions in one of the existing MLs?

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.