Re: Plasma 5
Carl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <3959367.hc0N4NtMld__30024.4198799648$1399595347$gmane$org@symcomtech> |
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 09:10:46 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi kde-promo,
>
> Within the Plasma team, many of us would like to go forward using version 5
> for our upcoming release ("Plasma 5"). We'd like to propose it to be taken
> forward. (The version "in the code" is already at 5, anyway.)
>
> Here's a quick run-down of the reasons why we think it's better than 2014.6,
> or <year>.<month of release>:
>
> - It communicates continuity: Plasma Next really is the continuation of 15+
> years of doing a desktop. It has our DNA all over it, and it's not a
> disconnected "today's thing". Especially to our existing userbase, and those
> just outside of it (other people known to Free desktops), this has a real
> meaning. It's something people love, and sometimes hate, and it's not a
> completely new thing. This is well in line with what we've been talking
> about all along for Plasma Next.
>
> - It's trusted and proven: it works and will cause no problems with
> packaging, and comparing version number
>
> - It solves a bunch of technical inconsistencies (plasmapkg2 vs kcmshell5 --
> why has one the 2 appended, the other 5?), library sonames are 5 as well.
>
> - It indicates (like we did traditionally) that this is the 5th major
> version, building on a new Qt5, and Frameworks 5, we get to re-use that
> kind of consistency.
>
> Note that it's not a unanimous decision, but a "this is what /most/ of the
> involved people think is a good idea". Further feedback of course welcome.
>
> It looks like we'll delay the release for 1 month, as Frameworks 5.0 has
> seen the same kind of delay and we wouldn't like releasing Plasma 5.0 on
> top of a Frameworks beta. A revised schedule will likely appear in the
> coming days. More on release preps will follow in the coming weeks, so we
> can make a nice splash around it.
>
> Cheers,
I like it.
I deal with users who are mostly oblivious to this kind of thing...to them,
"KDE" is enough.
Techies (such as LUG members) are not particularly interested in the internal
KDE conversations. Mostly these are people who will be calling the new release
"Plasma 5" anyway. "2014.6" won't make sense to them and won't be used.
It won't make much difference to the outside world that we have been using
various labels for the "new stuff". Our discussions have been speculative to
some degree. If something other than a simple "Plasma 5" is used, then
journalists and SlashSnark will come with questions if not insults.
From a promo point of view, Plasma 5 works better than the alternatives.
Carl
_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.
Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.