Re: Plasma naming scheme

Mario Fux <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events,gmane.comp.kde.devel.plasma
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Dienstag, 06. Januar 2015, 17.53:57 schrieb Martin Klapetek:

Morning

In general I think the first proposal by Thomas is quite good and agree with 
notmart and Co, that we can't fix every little detail as these are different 
levels of abstraction.

> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Thomas Pfeiffer <[email protected]>
> 
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 January 2015 14:11:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > > Does that make sense to everyone? And if so: Where should we publish
> > > > it and
> > > > where should we announce it?
> > > 
> > > This nomenclature sounds fine to my ears. Does this need announcement?
> > > I think the Dot editors have some wiki pages with these things, but
> > > other than that, to my biased self, this is common knowledge / common
> > > sense?
> > 
> > Well, if it were clear to everyone, we wouldn't have taken the effort to
> > define a naming scheme in the first place. Maybe the VDG is the only
> > group to
> > which this wasn't clear yet (we were not sure whether to call it "Plasma
> > Desktop 5", "Plasma 5 Desktop" or "the Plasma 5 desktop", for example),
> > but maybe it's not 100% clear to others, either. The broad nomenclature
> > is probably clear at least to people within KDE by now, but we believe a
> > good brand communication should be consistent down to details like the
> > ones mentioned above.
> > 
> > It probably doesn't need a public announcement, any maybe sending it to
> > the two lists I sent it to was sufficient. I'd also update the "KDE
> > Brand Map" [1]
> > if that's the document which people who do public communication refer to.
> 
> Looking at the wiki, it says "KDE Plasma *". Originally we went for "Plasma
> by KDE" format
> to get further from the idea that Plasma = KDE and make the rebranding
> clearer.
> Was that dropped? Or just forgotten?

I think neither nor. Looking at the wiki pages shows that the last edit is 
from December 2010 so why before (Plasma by KDE, which I like). And there is 
even still KOffice on this wiki page so it's "just" out of date.

But don't fear as the kde-promo team is mostly inexistent atm it doesn't make 
much difference ;-(

And I think it would make sense to update it of course so as soon as we agree 
I volunteer (if nobody beats me, I'm not really bored atm ;-) to update it.

> Imho puts a nicer touch to the name than "KDE Plasma" (which still supports
> the Plasma = KDE)
> 
> Cheers

Thx
Mario

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set digest on or temporarily stop your subscription.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.