Re: Akademy registration announcement is coming

Ivana Isadora Devcic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.events
Message-ID <CAB5Uq1pD65L9gXPtLqJ1ezO3kTCJk8toNPCLTt=NKMMAFCD-WQ__12678.9627284326$1495006489$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
Aleix is right. This is way too big of an overreaction to something that
was initially a small misunderstanding.
Akademy is fast approaching, and it's sad that we're wasting time on this
instead of working on something productive.

I understand that it's stressful to organize an event as big as Akademy. I
also understand that it feels weird when two people you don't know come in
and get involved with your project. But that's not an excuse to take it out
on Paul. He didn't write his comments to personally spite anyone - he was
just trying to make sure we're all on the same page.

The fact is that neither Paul nor I knew that the conference schedule was
completed. No one told us, and I haven't even seen the link to it prior to
this conversation.
We thought the registration was also still in progress, and this is
precisely why Paul asked about the dates - to make sure we don't publish
anything without the Akademy team's permission.

As for the Dot story announcement which you "normally" do, this issue is
based on 2 assumptions:
1) that we knew you were expecting a Dot story;
2) that we'll keep doing everything the way it has always been done.

As for 1), this was also a misunderstanding: we didn't know the meaning of
"announcement" was "a Dot story with highlights" for you.
This could have been simply solved if anyone just went to this task
<https://phabricator.kde.org/T5740> and wrote something like "hey guys, the
schedule and registration are now complete, we're waiting for your Dot
story". Then we could see how that fits into our plans and we would know
what you expect from us.

For 2), one of our main goals is to improve the state of KDE promo. If we
keep doing everything the same way it's always been done, how is anything
going to improve? Sometimes we will suggest to do things differently, or we
will test an approach that is different from what you're used to.
Of course, we will always discuss these things together, but if every
attempt at changing things gets shut down like this, that's not going to
benefit anyone.

At this point I'm not sure how to proceed, and I'm honestly a bit afraid of
suggesting anything if my comments are going to be received with hostility.
We made a promo plan for Akademy that we intended to share with the rest of
the Akademy team, but it doesn't make much sense for me to do this alone,
without Paul being able to see and participate in the discussion.

If the Akademy team doesn't want Paul and me to meddle with their promo
activities, that is fine.
In that case, please be transparent about your reasons, so that we can
learn something from them for the future.

If we are still going to work together - which I hope is the case - please
make sure to inform us about the progress of the Akademy project, or at
least have some patience when we ask about the details. From our side, we
will make sure to explain our decisions and share our plans well in
advance. We should all strive to communicate clearly, openly, and politely.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

Ivana Isadora

2017-05-17 1:39 GMT+02:00 Aleix Pol <[email protected]>:

> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Kenny Duffus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 12:25:56 BST Paul Brown wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 12:57:22 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> >> > Nothing on Dot news?
> >>
> >> Hello Jonathan,
> >>
> >> See https://phabricator.kde.org/T5625
> >>
> >
> > As the task is restricted access and he can't, I'll summarise
> >
> > We all thought there was going to be a dot story highlighting some of the
> > interesting talks in the programme and encouraging people to register as
> > we normally do but Paul wanted to just send an email to -community
>
> Guys, this is not acceptable, especially the tone.
>
> Paul, Sebas and Ivana have been working in this subject all weekend
> (among other things), I suggest that we either work with them or let
> them work, but despising other people's work is harmful.
>
> I'm not sure you realize how far the question of "when will we get a
> dot story?" has been escalated to with no good reason.
>
> We pride ourselves in being a welcoming community and I don't see that
> spirit in here. :(
>
> Aleix
>



-- 
Ivana Isadora Devcic
Marketing & Communications, KDE.org
@kdecommunity on Twitter <https://twitter.com/kdecommunity> || KDE on
Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/kde/>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.