Re: Future of the dot
Paul Brown <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.events |
|---|---|
| Organization | KDE |
| Message-ID | <3465407.MHq7AAxBmi@rachel> |
> Loosing comments and their moderation seems like a big downside to this > surely if Hugo can't do this we should, if considering moving from drupal, > look at alternatives that support what we need the dot to do? > > I feel the ability to share and work together on an end formated story with > images/links (in their final place) is a critical feature to have > > I'm not convinced how well the proposed workflow would work for > non-developers. It sounds pretty complicated compared to a cms > > While Hugo might work fine for some websites in KDE, I think expecting > every web thing we use to be able to be done with a minimal tool like Hugo > is a bit unrealistic and there is no need to even try to do this (your plan > is also unlikely to succeed completly imho, so we will still have different > types of websites anyway) > > So I think that if we are thinking about moving the dot from drupal we need > to have a proper look at what alternatives there are and whether they are > better than what we have currently Although I don't want to overtax anyone with extra work, I would have to agree. From what you are saying, compared to other CMSs, there doesn't seem much advantage in using Hugo, at least not for non-developer content creators (which is, in theory, what Promo would mostly be made up of). My first instinct would be to go with Wordpress, although I understand that that was tried and abandoned for some reason. Cheers Paul -- Promotion & Communication www: http://kde.org Mastodon: https://mastodon.technology/@kde Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kde/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/kdecommunity LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kde