Re: Newbie finds KATE acting strangely
Richard Owlett <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Sep 2024 12:16:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/17/2024 11:30 AM, Richard Troy wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2024, Richard Owlett wrote: >> >> *QUESTION* >> How do I start KATE as it would have been if it had never been run on >> this machine? >> > > Kate, as most utilities with personalizable attributes do, has an entry > in your home directory. > > I've only tried kate once and haven't bothered wiht it since but I knew > I had done this so I went looking: > > $ ls -A ~ | grep -i kate > > The above revealed nothing. > > The following, however, showed what you need to muck with: > > $ ls -A ~/.* | grep -i kate > > Presuming all that shows up is exclusively kate-the-editor related and > not something else (NOT a safe bet), you could remove all of it and it > should be as if you never had run it. > I get: > katemetainfos > katepartrc > katerc > kateschemarc > katesyntaxhighlightingrc > katevirc That all looks "safe" to remove. Am I correct?