Re: missing an old feature

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:18:27 -0300
"Gunther Furtado" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello Gunther,

> Thanks for taking the time to answer.

You're welcome.

> and rename the second one to take to a shop just around the corner
> that prints our baby's pictures for us. So for us it did make sense.

Okay, I see.  But why not just ask the people in the shop to print N
copies of each photo?

> > IMO, this is correct behaviour.
> IMHO, we have at least two takes on this, so it could be a case of

I probably overstated that.  When I said correct, I really only meant
expected (by me, at any rate).  As ever, differing requirements produce
different expectations.

There is, however, a workaround.  Drag the file to the project window.
Select, and rename it.  It's now possible to drag another copy of the
original across, as the rename only affects the project copy, not the
original.

Repeat as required.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"

Why do they try to hide our past pulling down houses and build car parks
Bricks & Mortar - The Jam

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/

_______________________________________________
K3b-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/k3b-user

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFHHjWVSXvR9Iq2E38RApkuAJinbrt9txSMMHzGgOHjFROdl9r8AKCX7cie
pwfyW/dggLDgqKYJEgRJuQ==
=iEra
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----