Re: Fw: Fwd: [Qt bugreports] Updates for QTBUG-75585: Massive performance regression in QML Date object
Robert Krawitz <rlk-FrUbXkNCsVf2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]> Fri, 25 Sep 2020 08:26:28 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.kimdaba |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/25/20 1:26 AM, Tobias Leupold wrote: > Just to ask this once again: Do we really need a new wrapper class? We already > have DB::ImageDate, which already wraps around QDateTime. It's used in more than just DB::ImageDate, and DB::ImageDate is more than just a wrapper -- it's conceptually something different, expressing a time range (separate start and end), not just a single time. Even if it were used only in DB::ImageDate, this would be a useful helper class to minimize redesign. > Am Freitag, 25. September 2020, 03:53:21 CEST schrieb Robert Krawitz: >> So I've taken a crack at a FastDateTime (wrote the header file and made the >> changes elsewhere, but haven't actually implemented it). However, it looks >> like I don't have ssh keys installed so I can't push now. >> >> I've attached the header file for reference.