Re: Startup performance

Martin Höller <martin-RZb/AGe+/[email protected]> Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:48:45 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.kimdaba
Message-ID <20201014084845.0eb867e0@linux-du93>
--===============6562616651472837587==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 boundary="Sig_/hEAJ+rxx_mPLxwjY1_dDd8="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--Sig_/hEAJ+rxx_mPLxwjY1_dDd8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 13. Okt. 2020 schrieb Andreas Schleth:
[...]
> I had similar ideas about splitting the DB. In fact I sort of do it
> myself since ages: Everybody has her/his own DB and only good pictures
> are migrated via Kim to the family album. Which is in a better backup
> level.

Thanks for sharing this use-case!

Import/Export is always an important area. And if we can reuse this
feature for merging a partitioned DB, it's even better ;-)

> This works nicely except that it is a bit of a pain to sync
> category entries. Which brings me to the point: Would it be possible to
> have one or more separate category-DBs alongside the image DBs?=20

If we decide to split/partition the DB, the categories are definitely an
area we need to think about. Moving it to a separate DB could IMHO be a
useful step.

regards,
- martin

--Sig_/hEAJ+rxx_mPLxwjY1_dDd8=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAl+Gn00ACgkQYJf22JPx7tmHNACg0KuD/OXcTCMWv4h/BjfHkIM1
cJEAn3bqaw7cWJk0ArFIZosmDTnPpqzi
=4Jjk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/hEAJ+rxx_mPLxwjY1_dDd8=--

--===============6562616651472837587==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
KPhotoAlbum mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kdab.com/mailman/listinfo/kphotoalbum

--===============6562616651472837587==--