R: koffice Digest, Vol 65, Issue 7

"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.koffice
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I want no more e-mail from [email protected]
Thank you.
Daniela Greca.

----Messaggio originale----
Da: [email protected]
Data: 23-ago-
2008 12.00
A: <[email protected]>
Ogg: koffice Digest, Vol 65, Issue 7

Send koffice mailing list submissions to
	[email protected]

To subscribe 
or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://mail.kde.
org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
or, via email, send a message with subject 
or body 'help' to
	[email protected]

You can reach the person 
managing the list at
	[email protected]

When replying, please edit 
your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of koffice 
digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Standalone KOffice for Linux, 
Please (Inge Wallin)
   2. Presenting KOffice 2.0; was: Standalone 
KOffice for Linux,
      Please (Alexandra Leisse)
   3. [Bug 149906] 
build failures with GCC from trunk (Gabe Yoder)
   4. [Bug 149906] 
build failures with GCC from trunk (Gabe Yoder)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:18:23 +0200
From: Inge Wallin 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Standalone KOffice for Linux, Please
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected].
se>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"

On Friday 22 August 
2008 10:45:42 Thomas Zander wrote:

> All our media should use the 
wording that "KOffice is based on KDE" 
> instead of the old "KOffice 
is for KDE".

With the risk of highjacking the thread, I want to point 
out that you put the 
finger on a very important point.

We have a hard 
work in front of us to get KOffice accepted for use on all 
platforms: 
Windows, Macintosh, KDE... and Gnome.  And of those four, I think 
the 
last one is going to be the toughest.

We have to think a lot about how 
to present KOffice 2.0 to the world before 
the real release of 2.0.

	-
Inge


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 
2008 17:12:45 +0200
From: "Alexandra Leisse" <[email protected]>
Subject: Presenting KOffice 2.0; was: Standalone KOffice for Linux,
	
Please
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
	
<[email protected]>
Content-
Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Inge 
Wallin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 August 2008 10:45:42 
Thomas Zander wrote:
>
>> All our media should use the wording that 
"KOffice is based on KDE"
>> instead of the old "KOffice is for KDE".
>
> With the risk of highjacking the thread, I want to point out that you 
put the
> finger on a very important point.

I made up a new one, to 
keep things sorted...

> We have a hard work in front of us to get 
KOffice accepted for use on all
> platforms: Windows, Macintosh, KDE... 
and Gnome.  And of those four, I think
> the last one is going to be 
the toughest.
>
> We have to think a lot about how to present KOffice 
2.0 to the world before
> the real release of 2.0.

I registered a talk 
for OpenExpo which is scheduled for Sep 24th.
Intention was to promote 
KOffice to a rather techsavvy audience as
well as preparing the new 
release. I kept the abstract fuzzy enough to
lead this talk into 
whatever useful direction.

If you intend to think about how to present 
2.0 IMHO you should start
soon as this needs some wise preparation and 
should be done before
beta1. This will give us the opportunity to 
promote the release as
effectively as possible and create enough 
interest _before_ the
release.

Maybe we can come up with a rough 
concept and then discuss it further
with the promo-team to make sure 
this effort gets widely spread. I
remember Jos Poortvliet putting it up 
already during a BoF at Akademy.

I'd be happy to get input from your 
side and be surely available for discussion.

Alexandra

>
>        -
Inge
> ____________________________________
> koffice mailing list
> 
[email protected]
> To unsubscribe please visit:
> https://mail.kde.
org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
>


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:42:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gabe 
Yoder <[email protected]>
Subject: [Bug 149906] build failures with 
GCC from trunk
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <20080823014255.
[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149906





--- Comment #4 from 
Gabe Yoder <gyoder stny rr com>  2008-08-23 03:42:54 ---
Created an 
attachment (id=26994)
 --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?
id=26994)
First of 2 patches to fix krs_cell build problem

Here's the 
first of two patches to fix the remaining build problems.  I can't
guarantee bug-free operation, but it allowed me to build against KDE 
3.5.9 with
gcc 4.3.1


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.
org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail 
because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 03:43:
40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gabe Yoder <[email protected]>
Subject: [Bug 
149906] build failures with GCC from trunk
To: [email protected]
Message-
ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: 
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149906





--- Comment #5 from Gabe Yoder <gyoder stny rr com>  2008-08-23 03:
43:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=26995)
 --> (http://bugs.kde.
org/attachment.cgi?id=26995)
Second of 2 patches for fixing krs_cell


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the 
assignee for the bug.


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
koffice mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice


End of 
koffice Digest, Vol 65, Issue 7
**************************************



____________________________________
koffice mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit:
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.