Re: KOffice team is looking for webmasters
Cyrille Berger <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:30:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.koffice,gmane.comp.kde.devel.koffice,gmane.comp.kde.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, It just came to my attention that the discution has somehow moved away from koffice-devel, well it's the problem with cross posting I guess (which is evil but was the best way to reach more people that could be interested in working on that). I would appreciate though if koffice-devel (at least) stays in the loop. Now I saw a couple of questions in the lists archives, lets try to answer them. An independent website isn't a must have for establishing a brand. If you take very famouse brand like Macbook, ipod or windows, their official page is part of the Apple or Microsoft website. But when you go to those page the only name you see is 'Macbook', 'ipod' or 'windows', mentions to Apple and microsoft are put in the background. Yet on those examples, work is done to associate the prodcut to the mother brand in the idea that if you use one of the product you will automatically want to use the other products, you have a macbook go get an ipod. In KOffice, for the 2.x series, we are going to give the message that, while KOffice is based on KDE's libraries, you can use it outside KDE, you can use it in Gnome, in Xfce, in Windows and in MacOSX (of course you will get the best user experience if you use everything from KDE). That's the reason why I feel an independent website is a good idea. In that aspect the first page of the current site isn't that bad ( To the exception of "KOffice is a free, integrated office suite for KDE, the K Desktop Environment."), it still show the link to KDE and yet KOffice is what is put in front. As to the question of the relation with userbase and other KDE website. I must admit that I don't understand the goal of userbase, I had a look at it, and in the application section I see two types of pages, presentation of applications (KOffice, digikam pages for instance) and then tips&faq (plasma, konsole...). When I first heard of userbase I understood that the idea was to concentrate user knowledge in one site, and that the content would be more about tips&faq&tutorial&documentation than application presentation. From now then I will assume that my first impression of the goal of userbase is the correct one, and I clearly see how it fit with an external koffice website. The koffice website would be limited to a general presentation of applications: * list of key features * some visual information like screenshots * release notes * koffice related news entry Which is pretty much what the current website has. Then the "user" knowledge content can go on the userbase website (we currently have some in koffice's wiki which should go elsewhere but was there in lack of a better solution). Tutorials, FAQ, etc... And of course the koffice website would link to that content. -- Cyrille Berger ____________________________________ koffice mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe please visit: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice