Re: intended unindent behaviour?
Jim Sabatke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.kplato |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Heiko, I like the MR Project approach. No matter which method we pick, there will be times when the other method would be preferred. So long as we can easily move nodes around, I don't think it makes much difference. My preference for the MR Project method is based on deciding that a node was mistakenly made a subnode and the following nodes were probably not meant to be subnodes. Heiko Evermann wrote: > Hi everyone, > > at the moment I am working on the node edit possibilities. > > Moving up/down and indenting works quite well so far. I have also > hidden the root node in the gantt view. So far I have not checked this > in, as the milestone stuff that I told you about, is not yet done. > > I have one question about the unindent behaviour: > > Let us start with > > 1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > > When I unindent node 3, > > MS Project shows > > 1 > 2 > 3 > 4 > > and gnome/MrProject shows > > 1 > 2 > 4 > 3 > > So MS Project also makes 4 a child of 3 instead of child of 1. And > MrProject just takes out node 3 and inserts it parallel to 1. > > I think the MS approach is more what the user might expect. > > > Which one do we chose? Opinions? > > Regards, > > Heiko Evermann -- Jim Sabatke Hire Me - See my resume at http://my.execpc.com/~jsabatke Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.